Radeon RX 7700 XT vs GeForce GTX 770M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
760A 760M 765M 765M SLI 770M 770M SLI 775M 775M Mac Edition 780M 780M Mac Edition 780M SLI
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
7400 7600 7600 XT 7650 GRE 7700 XT 7800 XT 7900 GRE 7900 XT 7900 XTX

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 770M SLI with Radeon RX 7700 XT, including specs and performance data.

GTX 770M SLI
2013
2x 3 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
12.52

7700 XT outperforms 770M SLI by a whopping 332% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 770M SLI GTX 770M SLI
RX 7700 XT RX 7700 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking43759
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data71.57
Power efficiency6.4317.02
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameno dataNavi 32
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 May 2013 (12 years ago)25 August 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19203456
Core clock speed811 MHz1435 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2544 MHz
Number of transistors2x 2540 Million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt245 Watt
Texture fill rateno data549.5
Floating-point processing powerno data35.17 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data216
Ray Tracing Coresno data54
L0 Cacheno data864 KB
L1 Cacheno data768 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB
L3 Cacheno data48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2x 3 GB12 GB
Memory bus width2x 192 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed4000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 770M SLI 12.52
RX 7700 XT 54.14
+332%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 770M SLI 9569
RX 7700 XT 57340
+499%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40−45
−363%
185
+363%
1440p21−24
−386%
102
+386%
4K12−14
−392%
59
+392%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.43
1440pno data4.40
4Kno data7.61

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
−401%
351
+401%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−642%
193
+642%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 24−27
−781%
229
+781%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 55−60
−184%
150−160
+184%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
−391%
344
+391%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−508%
158
+508%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−359%
188
+359%
Fortnite 70−75
−228%
240−250
+228%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−415%
278
+415%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
−331%
160−170
+331%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−278%
170−180
+278%
Valorant 110−120
−170%
300−310
+170%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 55−60
−184%
150−160
+184%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
−247%
243
+247%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
−56.7%
270−280
+56.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−408%
132
+408%
Dota 2 85−90
−312%
350−400
+312%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−341%
181
+341%
Fortnite 70−75
−228%
240−250
+228%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−404%
272
+404%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
−331%
160−170
+331%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
−246%
166
+246%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−485%
152
+485%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−278%
170−180
+278%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−794%
295
+794%
Valorant 110−120
−170%
300−310
+170%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
−184%
150−160
+184%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−369%
122
+369%
Dota 2 85−90
−312%
350−400
+312%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−307%
167
+307%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−328%
231
+328%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−278%
170−180
+278%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−409%
168
+409%
Valorant 110−120
−170%
300−310
+170%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 70−75
−228%
240−250
+228%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−429%
127
+429%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
−323%
400−450
+323%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−453%
105
+453%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−500%
90
+500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
−68.3%
170−180
+68.3%
Valorant 130−140
−156%
300−350
+156%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
−283%
130−140
+283%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−627%
80
+627%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−481%
157
+481%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−535%
197
+535%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−567%
120
+567%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 27−30
−439%
150−160
+439%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−288%
31
+288%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−367%
112
+367%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−533%
57
+533%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−424%
89
+424%
Valorant 65−70
−349%
300−350
+349%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20
−417%
90−95
+417%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−775%
70−75
+775%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−800%
36
+800%
Dota 2 45−50
−313%
190−200
+313%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−531%
82
+531%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−509%
134
+509%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−700%
95−100
+700%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
−558%
75−80
+558%

This is how GTX 770M SLI and RX 7700 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7700 XT is 363% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7700 XT is 386% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7700 XT is 392% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7700 XT is 800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 7700 XT surpassed GTX 770M SLI in all 57 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 12.52 54.14
Recency 30 May 2013 25 August 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 245 Watt

GTX 770M SLI has 63% lower power consumption.

RX 7700 XT, on the other hand, has a 332% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 770M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 770M SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 7700 XT is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 770M SLI GeForce GTX 770M SLI
vs
RX 5300M Radeon RX 5300M
RX 7700 XT Radeon RX 7700 XT
vs
RTX 4060 Ti GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GTX 770M SLI GeForce GTX 770M SLI
vs
Radeon E8950 Radeon E8950
GTX 770M SLI GTX 770M SLI
vs
NVS 280 AGP NVS 280 AGP
GTX 770M SLI GTX 770M SLI
vs
R5 M465 R5 M465
GTX 770M SLI GTX 770M SLI
vs
RX 5700 XT RX 5700 XT
GTX 770M SLI GTX 770M SLI
vs
Tegra X1 GPU Tegra X1 GPU
GTX 770M SLI 770M SLI
vs
RTX 3080 3080
Quadro M2200 M2200
vs
Iris Pro Graphics P580 Iris Pro Graphics P580
Quadro M2200 M2200
vs
R9 M370X R9 M370X
Quadro M2200 M2200
vs
HD 8790M HD 8790M
Quadro M2200 M2200
vs
Iris Graphics 550 Iris Graphics 550
Quadro M2200 M2200
vs
FirePro M4000 M4000

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.2 5 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 770M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 2802 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 770M SLI or Radeon RX 7700 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.