RTX A2000 vs GeForce GTX 770M SLI

Place in the ranking	395	143
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	89.89
Power efficiency	5.87	34.87
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	no data	GA106
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	30 May 2013 (11 years ago)	10 August 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1920	3328
Core clock speed	811 MHz	562 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1200 MHz
Number of transistors	2x 2540 Million	12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	70 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	124.8
Floating-point processing power	no data	7.987 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	48
TMUs	no data	104
Tensor Cores	no data	104
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	26

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	167 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2x 3 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	2x 192 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.8
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	3.0
Vulkan	-	1.3
CUDA	+	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 770M SLI 12.79

RTX A2000 35.46
+177%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 770M SLI 9569

RTX A2000 19978
+109%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	30−35 −213%	94 +213%
1440p	16−18 −181%	45 +181%
4K	10−12 −190%	29 +190%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	4.78
1440p	no data	9.98
4K	no data	15.48

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	21−24 −265%	84 +265%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −160%	65−70 +160%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −133%	95−100 +133%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 −170%	62 +170%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −160%	65−70 +160%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −219%	166 +219%
Forza Horizon 5	30−35 −179%	90−95 +179%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −203%	106 +203%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −122%	70−75 +122%
Valorant	50−55 −176%	140−150 +176%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −133%	95−100 +133%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 −126%	52 +126%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −160%	65−70 +160%
Dota 2	45−50 −180%	129 +180%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −178%	136 +178%
Fortnite	70−75 −119%	160−170 +119%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −150%	130 +150%
Forza Horizon 5	30−35 −179%	90−95 +179%
Grand Theft Auto V	45−50 −180%	129 +180%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −103%	71 +103%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	95−100 −102%	190−200 +102%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −122%	70−75 +122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −215%	120−130 +215%
Valorant	50−55 −176%	140−150 +176%
World of Tanks	170−180 −61.3%	270−280 +61.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −133%	95−100 +133%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 −95.7%	45 +95.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −160%	65−70 +160%
Dota 2	45−50 −161%	120−130 +161%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −89.8%	90−95 +89.8%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −110%	109 +110%
Forza Horizon 5	30−35 −179%	90−95 +179%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	95−100 −102%	190−200 +102%
Valorant	50−55 −176%	140−150 +176%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	18−20 −222%	58 +222%
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 −222%	58 +222%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	85−90 −173%	240−250 +173%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 −209%	30−35 +209%
World of Tanks	90−95 −151%	220−230 +151%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −168%	65−70 +168%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −136%	26 +136%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −170%	27−30 +170%
Far Cry 5	30−33 −280%	110−120 +280%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −155%	79 +155%
Forza Horizon 5	20−22 −190%	55−60 +190%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −130%	62 +130%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −176%	47 +176%
Valorant	30−35 −234%	100−110 +234%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −53.3%	21−24 +53.3%
Dota 2	21−24 −143%	56 +143%
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 −143%	56 +143%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −150%	20 +150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −205%	110−120 +205%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −188%	21−24 +188%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −143%	56 +143%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −233%	40−45 +233%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −53.3%	21−24 +53.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Dota 2	21−24 −161%	60−65 +161%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −219%	50−55 +219%
Fortnite	14−16 −243%	45−50 +243%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −150%	45 +150%
Forza Horizon 5	10−11 −220%	30−35 +220%
Valorant	12−14 −323%	55−60 +323%

This is how GTX 770M SLI and RTX A2000 compete in popular games:

RTX A2000 is 213% faster in 1080p
RTX A2000 is 181% faster in 1440p
RTX A2000 is 190% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX A2000 is 323% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RTX A2000 surpassed GTX 770M SLI in all 55 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	12.79	35.46
Recency	30 May 2013	10 August 2021
Chip lithography	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	70 Watt

RTX A2000 has a 177.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 114.3% lower power consumption.

The RTX A2000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 770M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 770M SLI is a notebook card while RTX A2000 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.