GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile vs GTX 765M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

GTX 765M
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
5.16

RTX 4070 Mobile outperforms GTX 765M by a whopping 773% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking58567
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.53no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ada Lovelace
GPU code nameN14-GEGN21-X6
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date30 May 2013 (11 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price$93 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7684608
CUDA cores768no data
Core clock speed850 MHz1605 MHz
Boost clock speed863 MHz2175 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate55.23244.1
Floating-point performance1,326 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 765M and GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Standard memory configurationGDDR5no data
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth64.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI+no data
HDCP content protection+no data
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+no data
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+no data
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+no data
Optimus+no data
3D Vision / 3DTV Play+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.13.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 765M 5.16
RTX 4070 Mobile 45.06
+773%

RTX 4070 Mobile outperforms GTX 765M by 773% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 765M 4019
RTX 4070 Mobile 41011
+920%

RTX 4070 Mobile outperforms GTX 765M by 920% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 765M 14870
RTX 4070 Mobile 97154
+553%

RTX 4070 Mobile outperforms GTX 765M by 553% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 765M 2479
RTX 4070 Mobile 29921
+1107%

RTX 4070 Mobile outperforms GTX 765M by 1107% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 765M 17616
RTX 4070 Mobile 161738
+818%

RTX 4070 Mobile outperforms GTX 765M by 818% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p51
−684%
400−450
+684%
Full HD41
−217%
130
+217%
1440p8−9
−863%
77
+863%
4K5−6
−880%
49
+880%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−1378%
133
+1378%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−660%
75−80
+660%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−1460%
75−80
+1460%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−1008%
140−150
+1008%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−800%
95−100
+800%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−1189%
116
+1189%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−412%
85−90
+412%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−731%
100−110
+731%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−605%
130−140
+605%
Hitman 3 12−14
−1850%
234
+1850%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−1214%
276
+1214%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−891%
100−110
+891%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−636%
100−110
+636%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−1635%
295
+1635%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−1071%
80−85
+1071%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−660%
75−80
+660%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−1460%
75−80
+1460%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−1008%
140−150
+1008%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−800%
95−100
+800%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−989%
98
+989%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−553%
111
+553%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−423%
68
+423%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−605%
130−140
+605%
Hitman 3 12−14
−833%
110−120
+833%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−1019%
235
+1019%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−1127%
135
+1127%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−636%
100−110
+636%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−1035%
193
+1035%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−1964%
227
+1964%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−1757%
130
+1757%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−660%
75−80
+660%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−1920%
101
+1920%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−800%
95−100
+800%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−867%
87
+867%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−412%
85−90
+412%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−605%
130−140
+605%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−771%
183
+771%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−991%
120
+991%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−936%
114
+936%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−1171%
89
+1171%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−636%
100−110
+636%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−790%
85−90
+790%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−1414%
100−110
+1414%
Hitman 3 4−5
−1350%
55−60
+1350%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−1133%
35−40
+1133%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1533%
45−50
+1533%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−900%
70−75
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2600%
54
+2600%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−1313%
113
+1313%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−978%
95−100
+978%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−1092%
143
+1092%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−3400%
105
+3400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1540%
82
+1540%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−3100%
64
+3100%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 14−16
−571%
94
+571%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−1900%
60−65
+1900%
Hitman 3 1−2
−3600%
35−40
+3600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−1080%
55−60
+1080%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
−5200%
53
+5200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−6900%
70
+6900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−967%
30−35
+967%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−2000%
42
+2000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 23
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1500%
60−65
+1500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−1080%
55−60
+1080%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−600%
45−50
+600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−3200%
33
+3200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−583%
40−45
+583%

This is how GTX 765M and RTX 4070 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 Mobile is 684% faster in 900p
  • RTX 4070 Mobile is 217% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 Mobile is 863% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4070 Mobile is 880% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4070 Mobile is 6900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 4070 Mobile surpassed GTX 765M in all 68 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.16 45.06
Recency 30 May 2013 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 115 Watt

The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 765M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
GeForce GTX 765M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 66 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 765M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1265 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.