CMP 170HX vs GeForce GTX 765M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking617not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.81no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGK106GA100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date30 May 2013 (11 years ago)1 September 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7684480
Core clock speed850 MHz1140 MHz
Boost clock speed863 MHz1410 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate55.23394.8
Floating-point processing power1.326 TFLOPS12.63 TFLOPS
ROPs16128
TMUs64280
Tensor Coresno data280

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x4
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Standard memory configurationGDDR5no data
Memory bus width128 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1458 MHz
Memory bandwidth64.0 GB/s1,493 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI+-
HDCP content protection+-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
3D Vision / 3DTV Play+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 APIN/A
Shader Model5.1N/A
OpenGL4.5N/A
OpenCL1.13.0
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+8.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 May 2013 1 September 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 250 Watt

GTX 765M has 233.3% lower power consumption.

CMP 170HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 765M and CMP 170HX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 765M is a notebook card while CMP 170HX is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
GeForce GTX 765M
NVIDIA CMP 170HX
CMP 170HX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 74 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 765M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 17 votes

Rate CMP 170HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.