Radeon RX Vega 10 vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI

Place in performance ranking	401	642
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	11.85	2.19
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Vega (2017−2021)
GPU code name	no data	Vega Raven Ridge
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	30 May 2013 (11 years ago)	26 October 2017 (6 years ago)
Current price	$149	$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 765M SLI has 441% better value for money than RX Vega 10.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	640
Core clock speed	850 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	no data	1300 MHz
Number of transistors	2x 2540 Million	4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	52.00

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 765M SLI and Radeon RX Vega 10 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	no data	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None
SLI options	+	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	2x 2 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	2x 128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	System Shared
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.4
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	2.0
Vulkan	no data	1.2.131
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 765M SLI 10.62
+150%

RX Vega 10 4.24

GeForce GTX 765M SLI outperforms Radeon RX Vega 10 by 150% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 765M SLI 7944
+134%

RX Vega 10 3389

GeForce GTX 765M SLI outperforms Radeon RX Vega 10 by 134% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 765M SLI 25021
+120%

RX Vega 10 11391

GeForce GTX 765M SLI outperforms Radeon RX Vega 10 by 120% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 765M SLI 5073
+123%

RX Vega 10 2272

GeForce GTX 765M SLI outperforms Radeon RX Vega 10 by 123% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 765M SLI 35376
+138%

RX Vega 10 14835

GeForce GTX 765M SLI outperforms Radeon RX Vega 10 by 138% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 765M SLI 68
+172%

RX Vega 10 25

GeForce GTX 765M SLI outperforms Radeon RX Vega 10 by 172% in Unigine Heaven 3.0.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

80
+371%

−371%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

16−18

no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18	no data
Battlefield 5	30−35	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18	no data
Far Cry 5	24−27	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33	no data
Forza Horizon 4	50−55	no data
Hitman 3	20−22	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45	no data
Metro Exodus	30−35	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40	no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18	no data
Battlefield 5	30−35	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18	no data
Far Cry 5	24−27	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33	no data
Forza Horizon 4	50−55	no data
Hitman 3	20−22	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45	no data
Metro Exodus	30−35	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40	no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18	no data
Far Cry 5	24−27	no data
Forza Horizon 4	50−55	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40	no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−33

no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20	no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6	no data
Far Cry 5	16−18	no data
Forza Horizon 4	20−22	no data
Hitman 3	14−16	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24	no data
Metro Exodus	16−18	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 +200%	5−6 −200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7	no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9	no data
Hitman 3	7−8	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	no data
Far Cry 5	6−7	no data
Forza Horizon 4	12−14	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12	no data
Metro Exodus	10−12	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5	no data