Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 765M SLI and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 765M SLI
2013
2x 2 GB GDDR5, 130 Watt
10.62
+12.6%

GTX 765M SLI outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking400436
Place by popularitynot in top-10080
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.87no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameno dataTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date30 May 2013 (11 years ago)15 August 2020 (3 years ago)
Current price$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores153696
Core clock speed850 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1350 MHz
Number of transistors2x 2540 Millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt28 Watt

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 765M SLI and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount2x 2 GBno data
Memory bus width2x 128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed4000 MHzno data
Shared memory-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data
Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112_1
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 765M SLI 10.62
+12.6%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 9.43

GeForce GTX 765M SLI outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs by 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 765M SLI 7944
+21.8%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 6524

GeForce GTX 765M SLI outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs by 22% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 765M SLI 25021
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 25394
+1.5%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs outperforms GeForce GTX 765M SLI by 1% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 765M SLI 5073
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 5139
+1.3%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs outperforms GeForce GTX 765M SLI by 1% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 765M SLI 35376
+31.4%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 26930

GeForce GTX 765M SLI outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs by 31% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD80
+208%
26
−208%
1440p18−20
+12.5%
16
−12.5%
4K12−14
+0%
12
+0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18 no data
Battlefield 5 30−35 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
Hitman 3 20−22 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45 no data
Metro Exodus 30−35 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18 no data
Battlefield 5 30−35 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
Hitman 3 20−22 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45 no data
Metro Exodus 30−35 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Far Cry 5 16−18 no data
Forza Horizon 4 20−22 no data
Hitman 3 14−16 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24 no data
Metro Exodus 16−18 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9 no data
Hitman 3 7−8 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Far Cry 5 6−7 no data
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12 no data
Metro Exodus 10−12 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11 no data

This is how GTX 765M SLI and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs compete in popular games:

  • GTX 765M SLI is 208% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 765M SLI is 13% faster in 1440p
  • A tie in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.62 9.43
Recency 30 May 2013 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 28 Watt

The GeForce GTX 765M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M SLI
GeForce GTX 765M SLI
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.3 24 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 765M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 822 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.