GeForce GT 710 vs GTX 485M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 480M GTX 480M SLI GTX 485M GTX 485M SLI
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GT 630 Rev. 2 GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 GT 635 OEM GT 640 Rev. 2 GT 710

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 485M SLI with GeForce GT 710, including specs and performance data.

GTX 485M SLI
2011
2x2 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
9.07
+460%

GTX 485M SLI outperforms GT 710 by a whopping 460% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GTX 485M SLI GTX 485M SLI
GT 710 GT 710

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking488964
Place by popularitynot in top-10069
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.04
Power efficiency6.225.85
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameN11E-GTX-A1GK208
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2011 (14 years ago)27 March 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$34.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768192
Core clock speed575 MHz954 MHz
Number of transistorsno data915 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt19 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data95 °C
Texture fill rateno data15.26
Floating-point processing powerno data0.3663 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 2.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x8
Lengthno data145 mm
Heightno data2.713" (6.9 cm)
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2x2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1.8 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data14.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataDual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA
Multi monitor supportno data3 displays
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision-+
PureVideo-+
PhysX-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.5
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p89
+536%
14−16
−536%
Full HD103
+1188%
8
−1188%
1440p16−18
+433%
3
−433%
4K35−40
+400%
7
−400%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data4.37
1440pno data11.66
4Kno data5.00

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+100%
8−9
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+1133%
3−4
−1133%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+100%
8−9
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+460%
5
−460%
Fortnite 50−55
+920%
5−6
−920%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+363%
8−9
−363%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+320%
5
−320%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%
Valorant 85−90
+136%
35−40
−136%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+1133%
3−4
−1133%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+100%
8−9
−100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+300%
30−35
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
Dota 2 60−65
+215%
20
−215%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+600%
4
−600%
Fortnite 50−55
+920%
5−6
−920%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+363%
8−9
−363%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+256%
9
−256%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+467%
3
−467%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+340%
5
−340%
Valorant 85−90
+136%
35−40
−136%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+1133%
3−4
−1133%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+100%
8−9
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
Dota 2 60−65
+250%
18
−250%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+600%
4
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+363%
8−9
−363%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+633%
3
−633%
Valorant 85−90
+136%
35−40
−136%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
+920%
5−6
−920%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
+550%
10−11
−550%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+340%
10−11
−340%
Valorant 95−100
+967%
9−10
−967%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
+500%
3−4
−500%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+26.7%
14−16
−26.7%
Metro Exodus 4−5 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Valorant 40−45
+450%
8−9
−450%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 30−35
+343%
7
−343%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%

This is how GTX 485M SLI and GT 710 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 485M SLI is 536% faster in 900p
  • GTX 485M SLI is 1188% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 485M SLI is 433% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 485M SLI is 400% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 5, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 485M SLI is 2000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 485M SLI surpassed GT 710 in all 55 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.07 1.62
Recency 6 January 2011 27 March 2014
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 19 Watt

GTX 485M SLI has a 459.9% higher aggregate performance score.

GT 710, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 426.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 485M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 710 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 485M SLI is a notebook card while GeForce GT 710 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M SLI
GeForce GTX 485M SLI
NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GeForce GT 710
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 485M SLI GeForce GTX 485M SLI
vs
HD 6970M Crossfire Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
GT 710 GeForce GT 710
vs
GT 720 GeForce GT 720
GTX 485M SLI GeForce GTX 485M SLI
vs
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
GTX 670MX SLI GTX 670MX SLI
vs
GT 740M GT 740M
GTX 480 GTX 480
vs
RTX A500 RTX A500
Quadro M1200 M1200
vs
RX 470D RX 470D
Quadro M1200 M1200
vs
GT 1030 GK107 GT 1030 GK107
HD 6990M Crossfire HD 6990M Crossfire
vs
RTX 5050 Mobile RTX 5050 Mobile
HD 6970M Crossfire HD 6970M Crossfire
vs
PRO W7800 PRO W7800
HD 6870 HD 6870
vs
RTX 3060 12 GB GA104 RTX 3060 12 GB GA104
GTX 470 GTX 470
vs
HD Graphics 510 HD Graphics 510
GTX 470 GTX 470
vs
HD Graphics 12EU HD Graphics 12EU
GTX 470 GTX 470
vs
Qualcomm Adreno 830 Adreno 830

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2 2 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 485M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 4415 votes

Rate GeForce GT 710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 485M SLI or GeForce GT 710, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.