GeForce GT 710 vs GTX 760M

Place in performance ranking	626	908
Place by popularity	not in top-100	49
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.77	0.04
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	N14E-GL	GK208B
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	30 May 2013 (11 years ago)	27 March 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$34.99
Current price	$163	$81 (2.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 760M has 4325% better value for money than GT 710.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	192
CUDA cores	768	192
Core clock speed	657 MHz	954 MHz
Boost clock speed	657 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	2,540 million	915 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	19 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	no data	95 °C
Texture fill rate	42.05	15.26
Floating-point performance	1,009 gflops	366.3 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 760M and GeForce GT 710 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0	PCI Express 2.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x8
Length	no data	5.7" (14.5 cm)
Height	no data	2.713" (6.9 cm)
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None
SLI options	+	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Standard memory configuration	GDDR5	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	1.8 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	64.0 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA
Multi monitor support	no data	3 displays
eDP 1.2 signal support	Up to 3840x2160	no data
LVDS signal support	Up to 1920x1200	no data
VGA аnalog display support	Up to 2048x1536	no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	Up to 3840x2160	no data
HDMI	+	+
HDCP	no data	+
HDCP content protection	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	no data	Internal
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI	+	no data
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support	+	no data
3D Vision	no data	+
PureVideo	no data	+
PhysX	no data	+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data
3D Vision / 3DTV Play	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	+	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 760M 4.45
+173%

GT 710 1.63

GTX 760M outperforms GT 710 by 173% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 760M 1720
+173%

GT 710 630

GTX 760M outperforms GT 710 by 173% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 760M 2271
+140%

GT 710 947

GTX 760M outperforms GT 710 by 140% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 760M 15900
+119%

GT 710 7270

GTX 760M outperforms GT 710 by 119% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GTX 760M 5569
+189%

GT 710 1924

GTX 760M outperforms GT 710 by 189% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Benchmark coverage: 5%

GTX 760M 4868
+152%

GT 710 1935

GTX 760M outperforms GT 710 by 152% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 760M 4287
+182%

GT 710 1519

GTX 760M outperforms GT 710 by 182% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 760M 17
+183%

GT 710 6

GTX 760M outperforms GT 710 by 183% in Octane Render OctaneBench.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	39 +179%	14−16 −179%
Full HD	46 +475%	8 −475%
1440p	8−9 +167%	3 −167%
4K	16−18 +167%	6 −167%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

10−11

+150%

4−5
−150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Battlefield 5	30−33 +173%	10−12 −173%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Hitman 3	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +167%	14−16 −167%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +157%	7−8 −157%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +163%	8 −163%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 +150%	12−14 −150%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Battlefield 5	30−33 +173%	10−12 −173%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Hitman 3	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +167%	14−16 −167%
Metro Exodus	8−9 +167%	3 −167%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +140%	5 −140%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +140%	5 −140%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 +150%	12−14 −150%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +167%	14−16 −167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +140%	5 −140%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 +167%	3 −167%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 +150%	12−14 −150%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9
+167%

3−4

−167%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Hitman 3	18−20 +157%	7−8 −157%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Metro Exodus	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11

+150%

4−5
−150%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Hitman 3	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%