TITAN RTX vs GeForce GTX 760A

Place in performance ranking	713	56
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	11.33
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	GK106	TU102
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	17 March 2014 (10 years ago)	18 December 2018 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$2,499
Current price	no data	$1035 (0.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	4608
Core clock speed	628 MHz	1350 MHz
Boost clock speed	657 MHz	1770 MHz
Number of transistors	2,540 million	18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	280 Watt
Texture fill rate	42.05	509.8
Floating-point performance	1,009 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	24 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	4008 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64.13 GB/s	672.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	3.0	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 760A 3.17

TITAN RTX 48.83
+1440%

TITAN RTX outperforms GeForce GTX 760A by 1440% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 760A 1226

TITAN RTX 18858
+1438%

TITAN RTX outperforms GeForce GTX 760A by 1438% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	10−12 −1480%	158 +1480%
1440p	6−7 −1633%	104 +1633%
4K	4−5 −1800%	76 +1800%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

79
−1419%

1200−1250

+1419%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	104 −1438%	1600−1650 +1438%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	104 −1438%	1600−1650 +1438%
Battlefield 5	209 −1431%	3200−3250 +1431%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	143 −1438%	2200−2250 +1438%
Cyberpunk 2077	79 −1419%	1200−1250 +1419%
Far Cry 5	127 −1435%	1950−2000 +1435%
Far Cry New Dawn	201 −1417%	3050−3100 +1417%
Forza Horizon 4	187 −1424%	2850−2900 +1424%
Hitman 3	117 −1438%	1800−1850 +1438%
Horizon Zero Dawn	332 −1436%	5100−5150 +1436%
Metro Exodus	144 −1428%	2200−2250 +1428%
Red Dead Redemption 2	127 −1435%	1950−2000 +1435%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	351 −1438%	5400−5450 +1438%
Watch Dogs: Legion	112 −1418%	1700−1750 +1418%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	95 −1426%	1450−1500 +1426%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	88 −1434%	1350−1400 +1434%
Battlefield 5	203 −1427%	3100−3150 +1427%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	131 −1427%	2000−2050 +1427%
Cyberpunk 2077	79 −1419%	1200−1250 +1419%
Far Cry 5	101 −1435%	1550−1600 +1435%
Far Cry New Dawn	154 −1426%	2350−2400 +1426%
Forza Horizon 4	254 −1435%	3900−3950 +1435%
Hitman 3	94 −1389%	1400−1450 +1389%
Horizon Zero Dawn	336 −1433%	5150−5200 +1433%
Metro Exodus	137 −1433%	2100−2150 +1433%
Red Dead Redemption 2	126 −1408%	1900−1950 +1408%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	286 −1438%	4400−4450 +1438%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	267 −1436%	4100−4150 +1436%
Watch Dogs: Legion	204 −1420%	3100−3150 +1420%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	79 −1419%	1200−1250 +1419%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	80 −1400%	1200−1250 +1400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	102 −1420%	1550−1600 +1420%
Cyberpunk 2077	78 −1438%	1200−1250 +1438%
Far Cry 5	79 −1419%	1200−1250 +1419%
Forza Horizon 4	175 −1414%	2650−2700 +1414%
Horizon Zero Dawn	218 −1437%	3350−3400 +1437%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	242 −1429%	3700−3750 +1429%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	139 −1411%	2100−2150 +1411%
Watch Dogs: Legion	86 −1412%	1300−1350 +1412%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

123

−1404%

1850−1900
+1404%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	95−100 −1431%	1500−1550 +1431%
Far Cry New Dawn	144 −1428%	2200−2250 +1428%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 −1381%	800−850 +1381%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	66 −1415%	1000−1050 +1415%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	122 −1416%	1850−1900 +1416%
Cyberpunk 2077	66 −1415%	1000−1050 +1415%
Far Cry 5	134 −1430%	2050−2100 +1430%
Forza Horizon 4	157 −1429%	2400−2450 +1429%
Hitman 3	100 −1400%	1500−1550 +1400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	168 −1418%	2550−2600 +1418%
Metro Exodus	114 −1435%	1750−1800 +1435%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	183 −1430%	2800−2850 +1430%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75−80 −1394%	1150−1200 +1394%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70 −1400%	1050−1100 +1400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

119

−1413%

1800−1850
+1413%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	88 −1434%	1350−1400 +1434%
Far Cry New Dawn	67 −1393%	1000−1050 +1393%
Hitman 3	48 −1358%	700−750 +1358%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 −1415%	1000−1050 +1415%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	66 −1415%	1000−1050 +1415%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	103 −1405%	1550−1600 +1405%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	52 −1438%	800−850 +1438%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	43 −1412%	650−700 +1412%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50 −1400%	750−800 +1400%
Cyberpunk 2077	33 −1415%	500−550 +1415%
Far Cry 5	49 −1431%	750−800 +1431%
Forza Horizon 4	114 −1435%	1750−1800 +1435%
Horizon Zero Dawn	102 −1420%	1550−1600 +1420%
Metro Exodus	82 −1424%	1250−1300 +1424%
Watch Dogs: Legion	43 −1412%	650−700 +1412%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

74
−1386%

1100−1150

+1386%

This is how GTX 760A and TITAN RTX compete in popular games:

TITAN RTX is 1480% faster in 1080p
TITAN RTX is 1633% faster in 1440p
TITAN RTX is 1800% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.17	48.83
Recency	17 March 2014	18 December 2018
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	24 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	280 Watt