GeForce 705M vs GTX 760A

Place in performance ranking	713	1028
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.08
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code name	GK106	GF119
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	17 March 2014 (10 years ago)	1 June 2013 (11 years ago)
Current price	no data	$163

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	48
Core clock speed	628 MHz	775 MHz
Boost clock speed	657 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	2,540 million	292 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	42.05	5.904
Floating-point performance	1,009 gflops	141.7 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 760A and GeForce 705M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus support	no data	PCI Express 2.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Standard memory configuration	no data	DDR3
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	4008 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64.13 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
eDP 1.2 signal support	no data	Up to 2560x1600
LVDS signal support	no data	Up to 1920x1200
VGA аnalog display support	no data	Up to 2048x1536
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	no data	Up to 2560x1600
HDMI	no data	+
HDCP content protection	no data	+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI	no data	+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming	no data	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support	no data	+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	no data	+
Optimus	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 API
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	3.0	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 760A 3.17
+169%

GeForce 705M 1.18

GTX 760A outperforms 705M by 169% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 760A 1226
+169%

GeForce 705M 455

GTX 760A outperforms 705M by 169% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

8−9
+167%

3−4

−167%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Far Cry 5	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Hitman 3	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 +131%	12−14 −131%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +163%	8−9 −163%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 +145%	10−12 −145%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Far Cry 5	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Hitman 3	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 +131%	12−14 −131%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +163%	8−9 −163%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 +145%	10−12 −145%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Far Cry 5	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 +131%	12−14 −131%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +163%	8−9 −163%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 +145%	10−12 −145%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6
+150%

2−3

−150%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Hitman 3	18−20 +157%	7−8 −157%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11

+150%

4−5
−150%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn	0−1	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6
+150%

2−3

−150%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.17	1.18
Recency	17 March 2014	1 June 2013
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	15 Watt