CMP 50HX vs GeForce GTX 760A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking811not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.09no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGK106TU102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date17 March 2014 (11 years ago)24 June 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7683584
Core clock speed628 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speed657 MHz1545 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate42.05296.6
Floating-point processing power1.009 TFLOPS11.07 TFLOPS
ROPs1680
TMUs64192
Tensor Coresno data448
Ray Tracing Coresno data56
L1 Cache64 KB3.5 MB
L2 Cache256 KB5 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x4
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB10 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed1002 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth64.13 GB/s560.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.07.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 March 2014 24 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 10 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 250 Watt

GTX 760A has 354.5% lower power consumption.

CMP 50HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 400% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 760A and CMP 50HX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 760A is a notebook graphics card while CMP 50HX is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A
GeForce GTX 760A
NVIDIA CMP 50HX
CMP 50HX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 28 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 66 votes

Rate CMP 50HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 760A or CMP 50HX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.