UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) vs GeForce GTX 760

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 760 with UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake), including specs and performance data.

GTX 760
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 170 Watt
12.41

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) outperforms GTX 760 by a significant 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking370319
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.42no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)no data
GPU code nameGK104Rocket Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date25 June 2013 (11 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 no data
Current price$136 (0.5x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1152no data
CUDA cores1152no data
Core clock speed980 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1033 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,540 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt15 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate94.1 billion/secno data
Floating-point performance2,378 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 760 and UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length9.5" (24.1 cm)no data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Minimum recommended system power500 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectorsTwo 6-pinno data
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed3000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth192.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPortno data
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+no data
3D Gaming+no data
3D Vision+no data
PhysX+no data
3D Vision Live+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)no data
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.3no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126no data
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 760 12.41
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) 15.70
+26.5%

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) outperforms GeForce GTX 760 by 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 760 7962
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) 11485
+44.2%

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) outperforms GeForce GTX 760 by 44% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 760 29073
+1544%
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) 1768

GeForce GTX 760 outperforms UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) by 1544% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 760 5959
+269%
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) 1613

GeForce GTX 760 outperforms UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) by 269% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 760 40150
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) 83293
+107%

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) outperforms GeForce GTX 760 by 107% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 760 75
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) 9013
+11885%

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) outperforms GeForce GTX 760 by 11885% in Unigine Heaven 3.0.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD66
+371%
14
−371%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20−22 no data
Battlefield 5 40−45 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 no data
Far Cry 5 27−30 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35 no data
Forza Horizon 4 60−65 no data
Hitman 3 24−27 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55 no data
Metro Exodus 40−45 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20−22 no data
Battlefield 5 40−45 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 no data
Far Cry 5 27−30 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35 no data
Forza Horizon 4 60−65 no data
Hitman 3 24−27 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55 no data
Metro Exodus 40−45 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20−22 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 no data
Far Cry 5 27−30 no data
Forza Horizon 4 60−65 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 no data
Far Cry 5 20−22 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 no data
Hitman 3 14−16 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27 no data
Metro Exodus 20−22 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10 no data
Hitman 3 8−9 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Far Cry 5 7−8 no data
Forza Horizon 4 16−18 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14 no data
Metro Exodus 12−14 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12 no data

This is how GTX 760 and UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) compete in popular games:

  • GTX 760 is 371% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.41 15.70
Recency 25 June 2013 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 15 Watt

The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 760 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 760 is a desktop card while UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
GeForce GTX 760
Intel UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1961 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 760 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 95 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.