Iris Plus Graphics G7 64EU Mobile vs GeForce GTX 760

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	368	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.33	no data
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Generation 11.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code name	GK104	Ice Lake GT2
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	25 June 2013 (10 years ago)	4 May 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$249	no data
Current price	$136 (0.5x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1152	512
CUDA cores	1152	no data
Core clock speed	980 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1033 MHz	1050 MHz
Number of transistors	3,540 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	10 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)	170 Watt	15 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	97 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	94.1 billion/sec	33.60
Floating-point performance	2,378 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 760 and Iris Plus Graphics G7 64EU Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	Ring Bus
Length	9.5" (24.1 cm)	no data
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Minimum recommended system power	500 Watt	no data
Supplementary power connectors	Two 6-pin	no data
SLI options	+	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	256 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	3000 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	192.2 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort	Portable Device Dependent
Multi monitor support	4 displays	no data
HDMI	+	no data
HDCP	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D	+	no data
3D Gaming	+	no data
3D Vision	+	no data
PhysX	+	no data
3D Vision Live	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.3
CUDA	+	no data

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	25 June 2013	4 May 2020
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	System Shared
Chip lithography	28 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	170 Watt	15 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---