Arc A350M vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

Place in performance ranking	347	344
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.32	no data
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Xe HPG (2020−2022)
GPU code name	GK104	Alchemist
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	27 September 2013 (10 years ago)	30 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price	$229	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1344	6
Core clock speed	915 MHz	1150 MHz
Boost clock speed	980 MHz	1150 MHz
Number of transistors	3,540 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	170 Watt	35 Watt (25 - 35 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	109.8	55.20
Floating-point performance	2,634 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM and Arc A350M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	241 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.3 GB/s	96 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.3
CUDA	3.0	no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	35−40 −2.9%	36 +2.9%
1440p	16−18 −6.3%	17 +6.3%
4K	8−9 −12.5%	9 +12.5%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	14.02	14.16
Recency	27 September 2013	30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	170 Watt	35 Watt