GeForce GTX 760 X2 vs Arc A350M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking412not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency39.85no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameDG2-128GK104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 March 2022 (3 years ago)19 November 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681152 ×2
Core clock speed300 MHz1006 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz1072 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate55.20102.9 ×2
Floating-point processing power1.766 TFLOPS2.47 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs2432 ×2
TMUs4896 ×2
Ray Tracing Cores6no data
L1 Cache1.1 MB96 KB
L2 Cache4 MB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data279 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB ×2
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s192.3 GB/s ×2
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.65.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 March 2022 19 November 2013
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 250 Watt

Arc A350M has an age advantage of 8 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Arc A350M and GeForce GTX 760 X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arc A350M is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 760 X2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A350M
Arc A350M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2
GeForce GTX 760 X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 76 votes

Rate Arc A350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 16 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc A350M or GeForce GTX 760 X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.