Radeon RX 7600M vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 750 Ti with Radeon RX 7600M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 750 Ti
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 60 Watt
10.14

RX 7600M outperforms GTX 750 Ti by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking446443
Place by popularity30not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.93no data
Power efficiency11.637.84
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGM107Navi 33
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date18 February 2014 (10 years ago)4 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6401792
Core clock speed1020 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1085 MHz2410 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate43.40269.9
Floating-point processing power1.389 TFLOPS17.27 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs40112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed5.4 GB/s2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth86.4 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMIPortable Device Dependent
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
3D Vision Live+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 750 Ti 10.14
RX 7600M 10.25
+1.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 750 Ti 3899
RX 7600M 3940
+1.1%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 750 Ti 5378
RX 7600M 35101
+553%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 750 Ti 21608
RX 7600M 77136
+257%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 750 Ti 4294
RX 7600M 25679
+498%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 750 Ti 31349
RX 7600M 126084
+302%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50
−60%
80
+60%
1440p30−35
−3.3%
31
+3.3%
4K21−24
−9.5%
23
+9.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.98no data
1440p4.97no data
4K7.10no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−337%
83
+337%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Elden Ring 27−30
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−274%
71
+274%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−445%
218
+445%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−3.7%
27−30
+3.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−226%
62
+226%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
−106%
74
+106%
Elden Ring 27−30
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−51.2%
62
+51.2%
Fortnite 55−60
−1.7%
60−65
+1.7%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−363%
185
+363%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−208%
111
+208%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−3.7%
27−30
+3.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−1.3%
75−80
+1.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
World of Tanks 140−150
−0.7%
140−150
+0.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−147%
47
+147%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
−2.8%
35−40
+2.8%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−2.4%
40−45
+2.4%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−293%
157
+293%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−1.3%
75−80
+1.3%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Elden Ring 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−2.1%
45−50
+2.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
World of Tanks 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−5.3%
20−22
+5.3%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−90.9%
21
+90.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−4.5%
21−24
+4.5%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−5.3%
20−22
+5.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Elden Ring 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

This is how GTX 750 Ti and RX 7600M compete in popular games:

  • RX 7600M is 60% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7600M is 3% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7600M is 10% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 7600M is 445% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 7600M is ahead in 28 tests (44%)
  • there's a draw in 35 tests (56%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.14 10.25
Recency 18 February 2014 4 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 90 Watt

GTX 750 Ti has 50% lower power consumption.

RX 7600M, on the other hand, has a 1.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 750 Ti and Radeon RX 7600M.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 750 Ti is a desktop card while Radeon RX 7600M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
AMD Radeon RX 7600M
Radeon RX 7600M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 6693 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 750 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 27 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.