RTX A500 Mobile vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Aggregate performance score

GTX 750 Ti
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 60 Watt
10.09

RTX A500 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 750 Ti by an impressive 53% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking412322
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.09no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameGM107GA107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date18 February 2014 (10 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data
Current price$357 (2.4x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6402048
CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed1020 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1085 MHz1537 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt60 Watt (20 - 60 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate43.4098.37
Floating-point performance1,389 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 750 Ti and RTX A500 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length5.7" (14.5 cm)no data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed5.4 GB/s14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth86.4 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMINo outputs
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+no data
3D Gaming+no data
3D Vision+no data
3D Vision Live+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 750 Ti 10.09
RTX A500 Mobile 15.46
+53.2%

RTX A500 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 750 Ti by 53% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 750 Ti 5378
RTX A500 Mobile 10748
+99.9%

RTX A500 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 750 Ti by 100% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD46
−21.7%
56
+21.7%
1440p16−18
−56.3%
25
+56.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−52.4%
30−35
+52.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−73.3%
24−27
+73.3%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−56.3%
50−55
+56.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−54.5%
30−35
+54.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−40%
40−45
+40%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−53.6%
40−45
+53.6%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−48.6%
50−55
+48.6%
Hitman 3 21−24
−56.5%
35−40
+56.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−47.1%
50−55
+47.1%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−62.1%
45−50
+62.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−53.6%
40−45
+53.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−175%
77
+175%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−55.6%
27−30
+55.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−52.4%
30−35
+52.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−73.3%
24−27
+73.3%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−56.3%
50−55
+56.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−54.5%
30−35
+54.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−147%
74
+147%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−53.6%
40−45
+53.6%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−48.6%
50−55
+48.6%
Hitman 3 21−24
−56.5%
35−40
+56.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−47.1%
50−55
+47.1%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−62.1%
45−50
+62.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−53.6%
40−45
+53.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−10.7%
31
+10.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−52.4%
30−35
+52.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−55.6%
27−30
+55.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−52.4%
30−35
+52.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−73.3%
24−27
+73.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−54.5%
30−35
+54.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−40%
40−45
+40%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−48.6%
50−55
+48.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−47.1%
50−55
+47.1%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−62.1%
45−50
+62.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−52.4%
30−35
+52.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−55.6%
27−30
+55.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−53.6%
40−45
+53.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−70.6%
27−30
+70.6%
Hitman 3 12−14
−69.2%
21−24
+69.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−117%
12−14
+117%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−58.3%
18−20
+58.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−56.3%
24−27
+56.3%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−52.6%
27−30
+52.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−47.6%
30−35
+47.6%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−80%
27−30
+80%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−200%
39
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 24−27
−37.5%
30−35
+37.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Hitman 3 6−7
−83.3%
10−12
+83.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−70%
16−18
+70%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−87.5%
14−16
+87.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Battlefield 5 8−9
−100%
16−18
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−70%
16−18
+70%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−50%
14−16
+50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%

This is how GTX 750 Ti and RTX A500 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX A500 Mobile is 22% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A500 Mobile is 56% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX A500 Mobile is 200% faster than the GTX 750 Ti.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX A500 Mobile surpassed GTX 750 Ti in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.09 15.46
Recency 18 February 2014 30 March 2022
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm

The RTX A500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 750 Ti in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 750 Ti is a desktop card while RTX A500 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile
RTX A500 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 5917 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 750 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 56 votes

Rate RTX A500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.