NVIDIA GeForce 920M vs AMD Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics

Buy
VS
Buy
Price now 895$
Games supported 58%
NVIDIA GeForce 920M
NVIDIA GeForce 920M
Buy
  • Interface PCIe 3.0 x8
  • Core clock speed 954
  • Max video memory 4096
  • Memory type DDR3
  • Memory clock speed 1800
  • Maximum resolution
AMD Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics
Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics
Buy
  • Interface
  • Core clock speed 655 / 450
  • Max video memory
  • Memory type
  • Memory clock speed 1800
  • Maximum resolution
Price now 90$
Games supported 58%

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in performance rating790789
Value for money0.060.21
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Terascale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameN16V-GM-Sno data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date27 January 2015 (7 years ago)15 May 2012 (10 years ago)
Current price$895 $90
Value for money

To calculate the index we compare the characteristics of graphics cards against their prices.

  • 0
  • 50
  • 100
  • 0
  • 50
  • 100

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384656
Core clock speed954 MHz655 / 450 MHz
Number of transistors915 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm32/40 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)33 Wattno data
Texture fill rate30.53no data
Floating-point performance297.6 gflopsno data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on GeForce 920M and Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+no data
GameWorks+no data

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX12 (11_0)11
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126no data
CUDA+no data

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 920M 1.87
HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics 1.87
  • 3DMark Vantage Performance
  • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
  • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Score
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GeForce 920M 5587
+12.2%
HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics 4981

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GeForce 920M 1719
+8.6%
HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics 1583

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GeForce 920M 7242
+24.7%
HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics 5807

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GeForce 920M 1048
+88.2%
HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics 557

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GeForce 920M 1162
+75.2%
HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics 663

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce 920M and Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics. Usually measured in megahashes per second.

Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 40 Mh/s no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16
−113%
34
+113%
4K9no data

Popular games

  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 15
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Metro Exodus 2
+100%
1−2
−100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
+250%
2−3
−250%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4
+100%
2−3
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Advantages and disadvantages


Recency 27 January 2015 15 May 2012
Memory bus width 64 128
Pipelines / CUDA cores 384 656
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm

Technical City couldn't decide between

NVIDIA GeForce 920M
NVIDIA GeForce 920M

and

AMD Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics
AMD Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics

The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Competitors of GeForce 920M by AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce 920M from AMD is Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 1 position in our rating.

AMD Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics
Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce 920M:

Competitors of Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics by NVIDIA

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics from NVIDIA is GeForce 920M, which is nearly equal in speed and is lower by 1 position in our rating.

NVIDIA GeForce 920M GeForce 920M
Compare

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics:

AMD Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics 100

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 639 ratings

Rate NVIDIA GeForce 920M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2 ratings

Rate AMD Radeon HD 7640G HD 7610M Dual Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.