NVS 810 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Place in performance ranking	411	727
Place by popularity	21	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.09	0.11
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code name	GM107	GM107
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	18 February 2014 (10 years ago)	4 November 2015 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$149	no data
Current price	$357 (2.4x MSRP)	$848

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 750 Ti has 891% better value for money than NVS 810.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	512
CUDA cores	640	no data
Core clock speed	1020 MHz	902 MHz
Boost clock speed	1085 MHz	1033 MHz
Number of transistors	1,870 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	68 Watt
Texture fill rate	43.40	33.06
Floating-point performance	1,389 gflops	2x 1,058 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	5.7" (14.5 cm)	198 mm
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	5.4 GB/s	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	86.4 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMI	8x mini-DisplayPort
Multi monitor support	4 displays	no data
HDMI	+	no data
HDCP	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D	+	no data
3D Gaming	+	no data
3D Vision	+	no data
3D Vision Live	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	+	5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 750 Ti 10.09
+231%

NVS 810 3.05

GeForce GTX 750 Ti outperforms NVS 810 by 231% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 750 Ti 3903
+231%

NVS 810 1179

GeForce GTX 750 Ti outperforms NVS 810 by 231% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

46
+283%

12−14

−283%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

16−18

+300%

4−5
−300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +250%	6−7 −250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +275%	4−5 −275%
Battlefield 5	30−35 +256%	9−10 −256%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +267%	6−7 −267%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Far Cry 5	30−33 +233%	9−10 −233%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +250%	8−9 −250%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +250%	10−11 −250%
Hitman 3	21−24 +283%	6−7 −283%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 +240%	10−11 −240%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +263%	8−9 −263%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 +250%	8−9 −250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +250%	8−9 −250%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 +260%	5−6 −260%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +250%	6−7 −250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +275%	4−5 −275%
Battlefield 5	30−35 +256%	9−10 −256%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +267%	6−7 −267%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Far Cry 5	30−33 +233%	9−10 −233%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +250%	8−9 −250%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +250%	10−11 −250%
Hitman 3	21−24 +283%	6−7 −283%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 +240%	10−11 −240%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +263%	8−9 −263%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 +250%	8−9 −250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +250%	8−9 −250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +250%	6−7 −250%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 +260%	5−6 −260%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +250%	6−7 −250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +275%	4−5 −275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +267%	6−7 −267%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Far Cry 5	30−33 +233%	9−10 −233%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +250%	10−11 −250%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 +240%	10−11 −240%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +263%	8−9 −263%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +250%	6−7 −250%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 +260%	5−6 −260%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

27−30

+250%

8−9
−250%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 +233%	6−7 −233%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 +240%	5−6 −240%
Hitman 3	12−14 +333%	3−4 −333%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +280%	5−6 −280%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +250%	6−7 −250%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +275%	4−5 −275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +333%	3−4 −333%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	24−27 +243%	7−8 −243%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Hitman 3	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Battlefield 5	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +333%	3−4 −333%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4	0−1