GeForce RTX 3090 Ti vs GTX 750 Ti

Place in performance ranking	410	8
Place by popularity	21	not in top-100
Value for money	1.07	14.28
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	GM107	Ampere GA102
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	18 February 2014 (10 years old)	27 January 2022 (2 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)	$149	$1,999
Current price	$357 (2.4x MSRP)	$1251 (0.6x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 3090 Ti has 1235% better value for money than GTX 750 Ti.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	10752
CUDA cores	640	no data
Core clock speed	1020 MHz	1560 MHz
Boost clock speed	1085 MHz	1860 MHz
Number of transistors	1,870 million	28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	450 Watt
Texture fill rate	43.40	625.0
Floating-point performance	1,389 gflops	no data

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	5.7" (14.5 cm)	336 mm
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 16-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	24 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	5.4 GB/s	21000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	86.4 GB/s	1,008 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMI	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Multi monitor support	4 displays	no data
HDMI	+	+
HDCP	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D	+	no data
3D Gaming	+	no data
3D Vision	+	no data
3D Vision Live	+	no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.3
CUDA	+	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 750 Ti 10.08

RTX 3090 Ti 76.81
+662%

RTX 3090 Ti outperforms GTX 750 Ti by 662% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 750 Ti 3903

RTX 3090 Ti 29752
+662%

RTX 3090 Ti outperforms GTX 750 Ti by 662% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 750 Ti 5378

RTX 3090 Ti 69481
+1192%

RTX 3090 Ti outperforms GTX 750 Ti by 1192% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 750 Ti 4294

RTX 3090 Ti 53110
+1137%

RTX 3090 Ti outperforms GTX 750 Ti by 1137% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 750 Ti 31349

RTX 3090 Ti 246319
+686%

RTX 3090 Ti outperforms GTX 750 Ti by 686% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	50 −320%	210 +320%
1440p	18−20 −678%	140 +678%
4K	12−14 −742%	101 +742%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

16−18

−1269%

219
+1269%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −452%	110−120 +452%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −967%	160 +967%
Battlefield 5	30−35 −388%	160−170 +388%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −559%	170−180 +559%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −1156%	201 +1156%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −576%	160−170 +576%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 −415%	130−140 +415%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −503%	210−220 +503%
Hitman 3	24−27 −731%	210−220 +731%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −705%	160−170 +705%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −665%	130−140 +665%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −1105%	265 +1105%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −850%	171 +850%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −452%	110−120 +452%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −820%	138 +820%
Battlefield 5	30−35 −388%	160−170 +388%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −559%	170−180 +559%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −981%	173 +981%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −576%	160−170 +576%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 −415%	130−140 +415%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −503%	210−220 +503%
Hitman 3	24−27 −731%	210−220 +731%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −705%	160−170 +705%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −1087%	178 +1087%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −665%	130−140 +665%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −1041%	251 +1041%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −1776%	394 +1776%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −756%	154 +756%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −452%	110−120 +452%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −720%	123 +720%
Battlefield 5	30−35 −388%	160−170 +388%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −850%	152 +850%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −576%	160−170 +576%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 −415%	130−140 +415%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −503%	210−220 +503%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −819%	193 +819%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −622%	130 +622%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −840%	140−150 +840%
Hitman 3	16−18 −1000%	170−180 +1000%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −738%	130−140 +738%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −1463%	125 +1463%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −1014%	75−80 +1014%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −1315%	184 +1315%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −770%	85−90 +770%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −1700%	108 +1700%
Battlefield 5	16−18 −759%	140−150 +759%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −1980%	104 +1980%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −825%	140−150 +825%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 −669%	120−130 +669%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −939%	180−190 +939%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −1533%	140−150 +1533%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −2060%	108 +2060%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −1171%	85−90 +1171%
Hitman 3	9−10 −1056%	100−110 +1056%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 −911%	90−95 +911%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −2000%	84 +2000%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −940%	50−55 +940%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 −2020%	106 +2020%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −2063%	173 +2063%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −950%	60−65 +950%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −1725%	73 +1725%
Battlefield 5	8−9 −1200%	100−110 +1200%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −5200%	53 +5200%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −1088%	95−100 +1088%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 −755%	90−95 +755%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −985%	140−150 +985%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −2233%	70 +2233%

This is how GTX 750 Ti and RTX 3090 Ti compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

RTX 3090 Ti is 320% faster than GTX 750 Ti

1440p resolution:

RTX 3090 Ti is 678% faster than GTX 750 Ti

4K resolution:

RTX 3090 Ti is 742% faster than GTX 750 Ti

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3090 Ti is 5200% faster than the GTX 750 Ti.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RTX 3090 Ti surpassed GTX 750 Ti in all 68 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	10.08	76.81
Recency	18 February 2014	27 January 2022
Cost	$149	$1999
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	24 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	450 Watt