Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 690

Place in performance ranking	335	437
Place by popularity	not in top-100	81
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.99	no data
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	GK104	Tiger Lake Xe
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	3 May 2012 (12 years ago)	15 August 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$999	no data
Current price	$411 (0.4x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	96
CUDA cores	3072	no data
Core clock speed	915 MHz	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	1019 MHz	1350 MHz
Number of transistors	3,540 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	28 Watt
Texture fill rate	234 billion/sec	no data
Floating-point performance	2x 3,130 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 690 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data
Length	11.0" (27.9 cm)	no data
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	Two 8-pin	no data
SLI options	+	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	no data
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5	no data
Memory bus width	512-bit (256-bit per GPU)	no data
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	384 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	no data	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Two Dual Link DVI-I. One Dual link DVI-D. One Mini-Displayport 1.2	no data
Multi monitor support	4 displays	no data
HDMI	Yes (via dongle)	no data
HDCP	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray	+	no data
3D Gaming	+	no data
3D Vision Live	+	no data
Quick Sync	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12_1
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.2	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	1.1.126	no data
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 690 14.43
+53%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 9.43

GeForce GTX 690 outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs by 53% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 690 13160
+156%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 5139

GeForce GTX 690 outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs by 156% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	35−40 +34.6%	26 −34.6%
1440p	24−27 +50%	16 −50%
4K	18−20 +50%	12 −50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

30−33
+50%

−50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 +36.4%	22 −36.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 +42.9%	21 −42.9%
Battlefield 5	40−45 +37.9%	27−30 −37.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 +52.8%	36 −52.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +50%	16 −50%
Far Cry 5	30−33 +36.4%	21−24 −36.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +34.6%	24−27 −34.6%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +52.2%	45−50 −52.2%
Hitman 3	35−40 +45.8%	24 −45.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +52.2%	46 −52.2%
Metro Exodus	50−55 +42.9%	35 −42.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +41.2%	17 −41.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 +44.7%	38 −44.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 +36.4%	22 −36.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +42.1%	19 −42.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 +50%	18 −50%
Battlefield 5	40−45 +37.9%	27−30 −37.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +40.6%	32 −40.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +38.5%	13 −38.5%
Far Cry 5	30−33 +36.4%	21−24 −36.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +34.6%	24−27 −34.6%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +52.2%	45−50 −52.2%
Hitman 3	30−33 +36.4%	22 −36.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	170−180 +51.8%	112 −51.8%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +42.9%	28 −42.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +40%	15 −40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +50%	30 −50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 +50%	30 −50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +42.9%	84 −42.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +50%	14 −50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +50%	14−16 −50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +52.2%	23 −52.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +45.5%	11 −45.5%
Far Cry 5	30−33 +36.4%	21−24 −36.4%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +52.2%	45−50 −52.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +52.2%	23 −52.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +45.8%	24 −45.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +50%	14 −50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +47.1%	30−35 −47.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24
+50%

−50%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 +50%	18−20 −50%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 +40%	14−16 −40%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +45.5%	10−12 −45.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +42.9%	7 −42.9%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +50%	16 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +41.2%	16−18 −41.2%
Hitman 3	18−20 +38.5%	12−14 −38.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 +50%	20−22 −50%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +38.5%	12−14 −38.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +42.1%	19 −42.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27
+50%

16−18

−50%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Hitman 3	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +50%	12 −50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +50%	12−14 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%