GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs GTX 690

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

GTX 690
2012
4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 GDDR5, 300 Watt
14.44

RTX 2050 Mobile outperforms GTX 690 by a significant 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking335279
Place by popularitynot in top-10030
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.99no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameGK104GN20-S7
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date3 May 2012 (12 years ago)17 December 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data
Current price$411 (0.4x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15362048
CUDA cores3072no data
Core clock speed915 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1019 MHz1477 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt30-45 Watt
Texture fill rate234 billion/sec189.1
Floating-point performance2x 3,130 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 690 and GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length11.0" (27.9 cm)no data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsTwo 8-pinno data
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR54 GB
Memory bus width512-bit (256-bit per GPU)64 Bit
Memory clock speed6008 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth384 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVI-I. One Dual link DVI-D. One Mini-Displayport 1.21x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMIYes (via dongle)+
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC supportno data+
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+no data
3D Gaming+no data
3D Vision Live+no data
VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.24.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2
CUDA+8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 690 14.44
RTX 2050 Mobile 18.66
+29.2%

RTX 2050 Mobile outperforms GTX 690 by 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 690 13160
+48.2%
RTX 2050 Mobile 8881

GTX 690 outperforms RTX 2050 Mobile by 48% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
−40%
42
+40%
1440p21−24
−38.1%
29
+38.1%
4K21−24
−42.9%
30
+42.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−40%
49
+40%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−37%
35−40
+37%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
−40%
42
+40%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−35.6%
60−65
+35.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−40.7%
35−40
+40.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
−40%
42
+40%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−46.7%
40−45
+46.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−42.9%
50−55
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−32.3%
85−90
+32.3%
Hitman 3 30−33
−46.7%
44
+46.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−34.5%
70−75
+34.5%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−37.8%
60−65
+37.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−45.7%
50−55
+45.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−36.4%
75
+36.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−31.4%
46
+31.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−37%
35−40
+37%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−31.3%
21
+31.3%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−35.6%
60−65
+35.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−40.7%
35−40
+40.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−42.9%
30
+42.9%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−46.7%
40−45
+46.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−42.9%
50−55
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−32.3%
85−90
+32.3%
Hitman 3 16−18
−31.3%
21
+31.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−34.5%
70−75
+34.5%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−37.8%
60−65
+37.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−45.7%
50−55
+45.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−37.8%
62
+37.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−45%
58
+45%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−42.5%
55−60
+42.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−37%
35−40
+37%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−40%
7
+40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−40.7%
35−40
+40.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−38.9%
25
+38.9%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−46.7%
40−45
+46.7%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−32.3%
85−90
+32.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−34.5%
70−75
+34.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−37.5%
55
+37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−37.5%
33
+37.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−50%
18
+50%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−45.7%
50−55
+45.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−33.3%
35−40
+33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−37%
35−40
+37%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−35.7%
18−20
+35.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−41.7%
16−18
+41.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−37%
37
+37%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−33.3%
35−40
+33.3%
Hitman 3 16−18
−37.5%
21−24
+37.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−40.7%
35−40
+40.7%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−41.7%
30−35
+41.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−34.3%
47
+34.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−47.6%
30−35
+47.6%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Hitman 3 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−35.7%
18−20
+35.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−38.9%
24−27
+38.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%

This is how GTX 690 and RTX 2050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 40% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 38% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 43% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.44 18.66
Recency 3 May 2012 17 December 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 30 Watt

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 690 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 690 is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
GeForce GTX 690
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 185 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 1600 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.