GeForce GTX 780M SLI vs 690

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 690 with GeForce GTX 780M SLI, including specs and performance data.

GTX 690
2012
4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 GDDR5, 300 Watt
14.43

780M SLI outperforms 690 by a considerable 40% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking335255
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.9943.97
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGK104N14E-GTX
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date3 May 2012 (12 years ago)30 May 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data
Current price$411 (0.4x MSRP)$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 780M SLI has 2110% better value for money than GTX 690.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15363072
CUDA cores3072no data
Core clock speed915 MHz823 MHz
Boost clock speed1019 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,540 million7080 Million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate234 billion/secno data
Floating-point performance2x 3,130 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 690 and GeForce GTX 780M SLI compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length11.0" (27.9 cm)no data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsTwo 8-pinno data
SLI options++

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR52x 4 GB
Memory bus width512-bit (256-bit per GPU)2x 256 Bit
Memory clock speed6008 MHz5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth384 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVI-I. One Dual link DVI-D. One Mini-Displayport 1.2no data
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMIYes (via dongle)no data
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+no data
3D Gaming+no data
Optimusno data+
3D Vision Live+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.2no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126no data
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 690 14.43
GTX 780M SLI 20.22
+40.1%

780M SLI outperforms 690 by 40% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 690 13160
+30.4%
GTX 780M SLI 10091

690 outperforms 780M SLI by 30% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD75−80
−42.7%
107
+42.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−25%
40−45
+25%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−37.5%
55−60
+37.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−28.6%
45−50
+28.6%
Battlefield 5 65−70
−36.4%
90−95
+36.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−34.1%
55−60
+34.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−25%
40−45
+25%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−38.3%
65−70
+38.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−38.9%
75−80
+38.9%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−30.4%
120−130
+30.4%
Hitman 3 40−45
−37.5%
55−60
+37.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−37.5%
110−120
+37.5%
Metro Exodus 65−70
−34.3%
90−95
+34.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
−36.4%
75−80
+36.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
−36.4%
90−95
+36.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−39.3%
85−90
+39.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−37.5%
55−60
+37.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−28.6%
45−50
+28.6%
Battlefield 5 65−70
−36.4%
90−95
+36.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−34.1%
55−60
+34.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−25%
40−45
+25%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−38.3%
65−70
+38.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−38.9%
75−80
+38.9%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−30.4%
120−130
+30.4%
Hitman 3 40−45
−37.5%
55−60
+37.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−37.5%
110−120
+37.5%
Metro Exodus 65−70
−34.3%
90−95
+34.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
−36.4%
75−80
+36.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
−36.4%
90−95
+36.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−36.4%
60−65
+36.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−39.3%
85−90
+39.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−37.5%
55−60
+37.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−28.6%
45−50
+28.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−34.1%
55−60
+34.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−25%
40−45
+25%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−38.3%
65−70
+38.3%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−30.4%
120−130
+30.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−37.5%
110−120
+37.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
−36.4%
90−95
+36.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−36.4%
60−65
+36.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−39.3%
85−90
+39.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
−36.4%
75−80
+36.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−28.2%
50−55
+28.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−34.1%
55−60
+34.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−34.6%
35−40
+34.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−32.4%
45−50
+32.4%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−37.5%
55−60
+37.5%
Hitman 3 24−27
−25%
30−33
+25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−34.1%
55−60
+34.1%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−31.6%
50−55
+31.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−31%
55−60
+31%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−36.4%
45−50
+36.4%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
−35%
27−30
+35%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
Hitman 3 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−25%
35−40
+25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%

This is how GTX 690 and GTX 780M SLI compete in popular games:

  • GTX 780M SLI is 43% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.43 20.22
Recency 3 May 2012 30 May 2013
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 200 Watt

The GeForce GTX 780M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 690 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 690 is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 780M SLI is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
GeForce GTX 690
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M SLI
GeForce GTX 780M SLI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 185 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 5 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.