Tesla S1075 vs GeForce GTX 680MX
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 425 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) |
| GPU code name | no data | GT200B |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 23 October 2012 (11 years ago) | 1 June 2008 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1536 | 240 |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 720 MHz | 610 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3540 Million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 122 Watt | 800 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 48.80 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 0.6221 gflops |
| ROPs | no data | 32 |
| TMUs | no data | 80 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | no data |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 102.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| 3D Vision | + | - |
| Optimus | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 API | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | no data | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | - | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 1.3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 23 October 2012 | 1 June 2008 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 122 Watt | 800 Watt |
GTX 680MX has an age advantage of 4 years, a 96.4% more advanced lithography process, and 555.7% lower power consumption.
Tesla S1075, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 680MX and Tesla S1075. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 680MX is a notebook card while Tesla S1075 is a workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
