Radeon HD 7340 vs GeForce GTX 680MX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 680MX with Radeon HD 7340, including specs and performance data.

GTX 680MX
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 122 Watt
9.14
+2305%

GTX 680MX outperforms HD 7340 by a whopping 2305% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5061306
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.411.52
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameno dataLoveland
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)6 June 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$552.69

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores153680
Core clock speed720 MHz523 MHz
Boost clock speedno data680 MHz
Number of transistors3540 Million450 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)122 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate92.2 billion/sec4.184
Floating-point processing powerno data0.08368 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
Interfaceno dataIGP
Widthno dataIGP
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth160 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision+-
Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API11.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGL4.54.4
OpenCL1.11.2
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 680MX 9.14
+2305%
HD 7340 0.38

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 680MX 3686
+2309%
HD 7340 153

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 680MX 6736
+1932%
HD 7340 332

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 680MX 25501
+2283%
HD 7340 1070

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD55
+2650%
2−3
−2650%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data276.35

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+4600%
1−2
−4600%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Dead Island 2 30−35
+3100%
1−2
−3100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+3900%
1−2
−3900%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+4600%
1−2
−4600%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Dead Island 2 30−35
+3100%
1−2
−3100%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+2800%
1−2
−2800%
Fortnite 50−55
+2600%
2−3
−2600%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+1200%
3−4
−1200%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+2600%
1−2
−2600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+357%
7−8
−357%
Valorant 85−90
+238%
24−27
−238%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+3900%
1−2
−3900%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+4600%
1−2
−4600%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+886%
14−16
−886%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Dead Island 2 30−35
+3100%
1−2
−3100%
Dota 2 65−70
+560%
10−11
−560%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+2800%
1−2
−2800%
Fortnite 50−55
+2600%
2−3
−2600%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+1200%
3−4
−1200%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+2600%
1−2
−2600%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+3300%
1−2
−3300%
Metro Exodus 18−20 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+357%
7−8
−357%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
+420%
5−6
−420%
Valorant 85−90
+238%
24−27
−238%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+3900%
1−2
−3900%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Dead Island 2 30−35
+3100%
1−2
−3100%
Dota 2 65−70
+560%
10−11
−560%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+2800%
1−2
−2800%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+1200%
3−4
−1200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+357%
7−8
−357%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+180%
5−6
−180%
Valorant 85−90
+238%
24−27
−238%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
+2600%
2−3
−2600%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14 0−1
Metro Exodus 10−11 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+2300%
2−3
−2300%
Valorant 100−110
+2425%
4−5
−2425%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 0−1
Dead Island 2 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Far Cry 5 18−20 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20 0−1

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3 0−1
Dead Island 2 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Metro Exodus 4−5 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10 0−1
Valorant 45−50
+2250%
2−3
−2250%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dead Island 2 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Dota 2 30−35
+3200%
1−2
−3200%
Far Cry 5 9−10 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%

This is how GTX 680MX and HD 7340 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 680MX is 2650% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 680MX is 2300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 680MX surpassed HD 7340 in all 28 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.14 0.38
Recency 23 October 2012 6 June 2012
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 122 Watt 18 Watt

GTX 680MX has a 2305.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

HD 7340, on the other hand, has 577.8% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 680MX is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7340 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 680MX is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 7340 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
GeForce GTX 680MX
AMD Radeon HD 7340
Radeon HD 7340

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 25 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 680MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 71 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 680MX or Radeon HD 7340, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.