FirePro D300 vs GeForce GTX 680MX

Place in performance ranking	396	413
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	9.02	4.49
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code name	no data	Pitcairn
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	23 October 2012 (11 years ago)	18 January 2014 (10 years ago)
Current price	$200	$260

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 680MX has 101% better value for money than FirePro D300.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	1280
CUDA cores	1536	no data
Core clock speed	720 MHz	850 MHz
Number of transistors	3540 Million	2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	122 Watt	150 Watt
Texture fill rate	92.2 billion/sec	68.00
Floating-point performance	no data	2,176 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 680MX and FirePro D300 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	242 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
SLI options	+	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	2500 MHz	5080 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160 GB/s	162.6 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

4x DisplayPort

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	no data	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	no data	1.2.131
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 680MX 10.73
+6.4%

FirePro D300 10.08

GeForce GTX 680MX outperforms FirePro D300 by 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GTX 680MX 12198

FirePro D300 19273
+58%

FirePro D300 outperforms GeForce GTX 680MX by 58% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

52
+15.6%

45−50

−15.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

16−18
+21.4%

14−16

−21.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +22.2%	18−20 −22.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%
Battlefield 5	30−35 +13.3%	30−33 −13.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +22.2%	18−20 −22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +21.4%	14−16 −21.4%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +19%	21−24 −19%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 +11.1%	27−30 −11.1%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +15.6%	45−50 −15.6%
Hitman 3	20−22 +11.1%	18−20 −11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 +12.5%	40−45 −12.5%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +13.3%	30−33 −13.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33 +11.1%	27−30 −11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +10%	30−33 −10%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +8.6%	35−40 −8.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +22.2%	18−20 −22.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%
Battlefield 5	30−35 +13.3%	30−33 −13.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +22.2%	18−20 −22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +21.4%	14−16 −21.4%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +19%	21−24 −19%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 +11.1%	27−30 −11.1%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +15.6%	45−50 −15.6%
Hitman 3	20−22 +11.1%	18−20 −11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 +12.5%	40−45 −12.5%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +13.3%	30−33 −13.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33 +11.1%	27−30 −11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +10%	30−33 −10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	26 +8.3%	24−27 −8.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +8.6%	35−40 −8.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +22.2%	18−20 −22.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +22.2%	18−20 −22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +21.4%	14−16 −21.4%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +19%	21−24 −19%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +15.6%	45−50 −15.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 +12.5%	40−45 −12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +10%	30−33 −10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14 +16.7%	12−14 −16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +8.6%	35−40 −8.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−33
+11.1%

27−30

−11.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 +16.7%	18−20 −16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 +12.5%	16−18 −12.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +21.4%	14−16 −21.4%
Forza Horizon 4	20−22 +11.1%	18−20 −11.1%
Hitman 3	14−16 +16.7%	12−14 −16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +22.2%	18−20 −22.2%
Metro Exodus	16−18 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 +7.1%	14−16 −7.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20
+12.5%

16−18

−12.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Hitman 3	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 +16.7%	12−14 −16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%
Metro Exodus	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%