GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs GTX 680M SLI
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 680M SLI with GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2, including specs and performance data.
680M SLI outperforms GTS 450 Rev. 2 by a whopping 277% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 385 | 737 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 2.87 |
| Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) |
| GPU code name | N13E-GTX | GF116 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 4 June 2012 (13 years ago) | 15 March 2011 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2688 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 720 MHz | 783 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,170 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 106 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 25.06 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 0.6013 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 16 |
| TMUs | no data | 32 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 256 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 210 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 6-pin |
| SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2x 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 2x 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 902 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 57.73 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| HDMI | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | no data | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | - | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| 900p | 133
+280%
| 35−40
−280%
|
| Full HD | 98
+308%
| 24−27
−308%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 85−90
+310%
|
21−24
−310%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+300%
|
8−9
−300%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 27−30
+300%
|
7−8
−300%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 65−70
+313%
|
16−18
−313%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 85−90
+310%
|
21−24
−310%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+300%
|
8−9
−300%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 50−55
+317%
|
12−14
−317%
|
| Fortnite | 85−90
+305%
|
21−24
−305%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65
+294%
|
16−18
−294%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 45−50
+300%
|
12−14
−300%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 27−30
+300%
|
7−8
−300%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 55−60
+307%
|
14−16
−307%
|
| Valorant | 120−130
+317%
|
30−33
−317%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 65−70
+313%
|
16−18
−313%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 85−90
+310%
|
21−24
−310%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 229
+282%
|
60−65
−282%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+300%
|
8−9
−300%
|
| Dota 2 | 95−100
+296%
|
24−27
−296%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 50−55
+317%
|
12−14
−317%
|
| Fortnite | 85−90
+305%
|
21−24
−305%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65
+294%
|
16−18
−294%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 45−50
+300%
|
12−14
−300%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 55−60
+307%
|
14−16
−307%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 27−30
+300%
|
7−8
−300%
|
| Metro Exodus | 30−35
+300%
|
8−9
−300%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 55−60
+307%
|
14−16
−307%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 40−45
+310%
|
10−11
−310%
|
| Valorant | 120−130
+317%
|
30−33
−317%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 65−70
+313%
|
16−18
−313%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+300%
|
8−9
−300%
|
| Dota 2 | 95−100
+296%
|
24−27
−296%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 50−55
+317%
|
12−14
−317%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65
+294%
|
16−18
−294%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 27−30
+300%
|
7−8
−300%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 55−60
+307%
|
14−16
−307%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 40−45
+310%
|
10−11
−310%
|
| Valorant | 120−130
+317%
|
30−33
−317%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 85−90
+305%
|
21−24
−305%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−33
+329%
|
7−8
−329%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 110−120
+319%
|
27−30
−319%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 24−27
+317%
|
6−7
−317%
|
| Metro Exodus | 18−20
+280%
|
5−6
−280%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 150−160
+329%
|
35−40
−329%
|
| Valorant | 150−160
+285%
|
40−45
−285%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+330%
|
10−11
−330%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
+367%
|
3−4
−367%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35
+278%
|
9−10
−278%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+311%
|
9−10
−311%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 16−18
+325%
|
4−5
−325%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
+340%
|
5−6
−340%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 30−35
+278%
|
9−10
−278%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
+300%
|
3−4
−300%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 27−30
+300%
|
7−8
−300%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
| Metro Exodus | 12−14
+300%
|
3−4
−300%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
+320%
|
5−6
−320%
|
| Valorant | 80−85
+300%
|
21−24
−300%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 21−24
+340%
|
5−6
−340%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
+300%
|
3−4
−300%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
| Dota 2 | 50−55
+286%
|
14−16
−286%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 16−18
+325%
|
4−5
−325%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
+333%
|
6−7
−333%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 14−16
+400%
|
3−4
−400%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 14−16
+400%
|
3−4
−400%
|
This is how GTX 680M SLI and GTS 450 Rev. 2 compete in popular games:
- GTX 680M SLI is 280% faster in 900p
- GTX 680M SLI is 308% faster in 1080p
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 14.22 | 3.77 |
| Recency | 4 June 2012 | 15 March 2011 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 40 nm |
GTX 680M SLI has a 277.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce GTX 680M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 680M SLI is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
