Radeon RX Vega 3 vs GeForce GTX 675M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 675M and Radeon RX Vega 3, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 675M
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
5.01
+67.6%

GTX 675M outperforms RX Vega 3 by an impressive 68% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking634783
Place by popularitynot in top-10085
Power efficiency3.4513.72
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGF114Picasso
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date22 March 2012 (12 years ago)6 January 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384192
Core clock speed620 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1001 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate39.6812.01
Floating-point processing power0.9523 TFLOPS0.3844 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs6412

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)IGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256bitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth96.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 675M 5.01
+67.6%
RX Vega 3 2.99

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 675M 1927
+67.7%
RX Vega 3 1149

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 675M 3218
+86.7%
RX Vega 3 1724

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 675M 14756
+171%
RX Vega 3 5441

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 675M 2331
+99%
RX Vega 3 1172

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 675M 18056
+112%
RX Vega 3 8536

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

GTX 675M 35
+150%
RX Vega 3 14

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p48
+77.8%
27−30
−77.8%
Full HD48
+300%
12
−300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Elden Ring 12−14
+71.4%
7
−71.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+50%
14
−50%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+140%
5
−140%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+150%
6
−150%
Valorant 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Dota 2 16−18
+23.1%
13
−23.1%
Elden Ring 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+100%
12
−100%
Fortnite 27−30
+70.6%
16−18
−70.6%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+90.9%
11
−90.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+77.8%
9
−77.8%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+95.5%
22
−95.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+36.4%
10−12
−36.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+433%
3
−433%
Valorant 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
World of Tanks 102
+343%
23
−343%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Dota 2 16−18
−18.8%
19
+18.8%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+41.2%
16−18
−41.2%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+133%
9
−133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+59.3%
27−30
−59.3%
Valorant 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Elden Ring 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+57.1%
21−24
−57.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
World of Tanks 35−40
+71.4%
21−24
−71.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Valorant 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Elden Ring 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Fortnite 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 0−1
Valorant 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

This is how GTX 675M and RX Vega 3 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 675M is 78% faster in 900p
  • GTX 675M is 300% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 675M is 1100% faster.
  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX Vega 3 is 19% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 675M is ahead in 55 tests (95%)
  • RX Vega 3 is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.01 2.99
Recency 22 March 2012 6 January 2019
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 15 Watt

GTX 675M has a 67.6% higher aggregate performance score.

RX Vega 3, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 566.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 675M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 3 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M
GeForce GTX 675M
AMD Radeon RX Vega 3
Radeon RX Vega 3

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 21 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 675M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2026 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.