Radeon 610M vs Iris Pro Graphics P580

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Radeon 610M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Iris Pro Graphics P580
2015
64 GB DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4, 15 Watt
5.25
+81.7%

Iris Pro Graphics P580 outperforms 610M by an impressive 82% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking620790
Place by popularitynot in top-10050
Power efficiency24.0913.26
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameSkylake GT4eDragon Range
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores576128
Core clock speed350 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate75.6017.60
Floating-point processing power1.21 TFLOPS0.5632 TFLOPS
ROPs94
TMUs728
Ray Tracing Coresno data2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4System Shared
Maximum RAM amount64 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Pro Graphics P580 5.25
+81.7%
Radeon 610M 2.89

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Iris Pro Graphics P580 2020
+81.8%
Radeon 610M 1111

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21−24
+61.5%
13
−61.5%
1440p110−120
+80.3%
61
−80.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Elden Ring 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+15.8%
19
−15.8%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−23.1%
16
+23.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Valorant 12−14 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Dota 2 16−18
+70%
10
−70%
Elden Ring 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+19%
21
−19%
Fortnite 30−35
+93.8%
16−18
−93.8%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+57.1%
14
−57.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+6.3%
16
−6.3%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+18.2%
11
−18.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+63%
27−30
−63%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+54.5%
10−12
−54.5%
Valorant 12−14 0−1
World of Tanks 85−90
+63.5%
50−55
−63.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Dota 2 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+100%
11
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+63%
27−30
−63%
Valorant 12−14 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 4−5 0−1
Elden Ring 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+70%
20−22
−70%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
World of Tanks 35−40
+90%
20−22
−90%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Valorant 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Elden Ring 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Fortnite 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Valorant 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

This is how Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Radeon 610M compete in popular games:

  • Iris Pro Graphics P580 is 62% faster in 1080p
  • Iris Pro Graphics P580 is 80% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Iris Pro Graphics P580 is 700% faster.
  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Radeon 610M is 23% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Iris Pro Graphics P580 is ahead in 52 tests (96%)
  • Radeon 610M is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.25 2.89
Recency 1 September 2015 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm

Iris Pro Graphics P580 has a 81.7% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 610M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Iris Pro Graphics P580 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 610M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580
Iris Pro Graphics P580
AMD Radeon 610M
Radeon 610M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 4 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics P580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 807 votes

Rate Radeon 610M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.