GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs GTX 675M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 675M and GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 675M
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
5.01

RTX 2050 Mobile outperforms GTX 675M by a whopping 274% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking635299
Place by popularitynot in top-10017
Power efficiency3.4628.72
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGF114GA107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date22 March 2012 (12 years ago)17 December 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842048
Core clock speed620 MHz1185 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1477 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate39.6894.53
Floating-point processing power0.9523 TFLOPS6.05 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs6464
Tensor Coresno data256
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x8
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.0 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 675M 5.01
RTX 2050 Mobile 18.74
+274%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 675M 3218
RTX 2050 Mobile 12495
+288%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 675M 14756
RTX 2050 Mobile 46821
+217%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 675M 2331
RTX 2050 Mobile 8965
+285%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 675M 18056
RTX 2050 Mobile 58257
+223%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p48
−254%
170−180
+254%
Full HD48
+14.3%
42
−14.3%
1440p8−9
−313%
33
+313%
4K6−7
−317%
25
+317%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−227%
36
+227%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−345%
49
+345%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−300%
60−65
+300%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−209%
34
+209%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−90.9%
21
+90.9%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−262%
76
+262%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
−390%
49
+390%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−325%
50−55
+325%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−193%
40−45
+193%
Valorant 14−16
−521%
87
+521%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−300%
60−65
+300%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−145%
27
+145%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−36.4%
15
+36.4%
Dota 2 16−18
−431%
85
+431%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−192%
70
+192%
Fortnite 27−30
−245%
100−105
+245%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−200%
63
+200%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
−400%
50−55
+400%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−331%
69
+331%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−325%
50−55
+325%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−198%
120−130
+198%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−193%
40−45
+193%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−263%
55−60
+263%
Valorant 14−16
−207%
43
+207%
World of Tanks 102
−119%
220−230
+119%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−300%
60−65
+300%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−109%
23
+109%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−18.2%
13
+18.2%
Dota 2 16−18
−588%
110
+588%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−167%
60−65
+167%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−167%
56
+167%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
−230%
33
+230%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−198%
120−130
+198%
Valorant 14−16
−443%
75−80
+443%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 4−5
−825%
37
+825%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
−640%
37
+640%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−409%
160−170
+409%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−325%
16−18
+325%
World of Tanks 35−40
−256%
120−130
+256%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−443%
35−40
+443%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−200%
14−16
+200%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−345%
45−50
+345%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−488%
47
+488%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−950%
40−45
+950%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−225%
24−27
+225%
Valorant 14−16
−243%
45−50
+243%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−88.2%
30−35
+88.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−100%
30−35
+100%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−300%
55−60
+300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−100%
30−35
+100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Dota 2 16−18
−100%
34
+100%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Fortnite 4−5
−450%
21−24
+450%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−600%
27−30
+600%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−400%
14−16
+400%
Valorant 5−6
−340%
21−24
+340%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how GTX 675M and RTX 2050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 254% faster in 900p
  • GTX 675M is 14% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 313% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 317% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2050 Mobile is 1300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 2050 Mobile is ahead in 61 test (95%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.01 18.74
Recency 22 March 2012 17 December 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 45 Watt

RTX 2050 Mobile has a 274.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 400% more advanced lithography process, and 122.2% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 675M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M
GeForce GTX 675M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 21 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 675M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 2351 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.