Radeon Pro W6600M vs GeForce GTX 675M

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 675M with Radeon Pro W6600M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 675M
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
4.31

Pro W6600M outperforms GTX 675M by a whopping 498% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking643201
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.4322.79
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGF114Navi 23
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date22 March 2012 (12 years ago)8 June 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841792
Core clock speed620 MHz1224 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2034 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate39.68227.8
Floating-point processing power0.9523 TFLOPS7.29 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs64112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 675M 4.31
Pro W6600M 25.77
+498%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 675M 1927
Pro W6600M 11524
+498%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p48
−483%
280−290
+483%
Full HD48
−483%
280−290
+483%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
−618%
75−80
+618%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
−705%
160−170
+705%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−520%
60−65
+520%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
−618%
75−80
+618%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−458%
100−110
+458%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
−705%
160−170
+705%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−520%
60−65
+520%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−608%
90−95
+608%
Fortnite 27−30
−389%
130−140
+389%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−400%
110−120
+400%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
−642%
85−90
+642%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−517%
110−120
+517%
Valorant 55−60
−208%
180−190
+208%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
−618%
75−80
+618%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−458%
100−110
+458%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
−705%
160−170
+705%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 102
−164%
260−270
+164%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−520%
60−65
+520%
Dota 2 40−45
−225%
130−140
+225%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−608%
90−95
+608%
Fortnite 27−30
−389%
130−140
+389%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−400%
110−120
+400%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
−642%
85−90
+642%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−525%
100−105
+525%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−600%
60−65
+600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−517%
110−120
+517%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−577%
85−90
+577%
Valorant 55−60
−208%
180−190
+208%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−458%
100−110
+458%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−520%
60−65
+520%
Dota 2 40−45
−225%
130−140
+225%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−608%
90−95
+608%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−400%
110−120
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−517%
110−120
+517%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−577%
85−90
+577%
Valorant 55−60
−208%
180−190
+208%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
−389%
130−140
+389%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−829%
65−70
+829%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
−442%
190−200
+442%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
−960%
50−55
+960%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−1200%
35−40
+1200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−415%
170−180
+415%
Valorant 50−55
−331%
220−230
+331%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−1800%
75−80
+1800%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−625%
27−30
+625%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−622%
65−70
+622%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−573%
70−75
+573%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−586%
45−50
+586%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
−667%
65−70
+667%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
−450%
21−24
+450%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−238%
50−55
+238%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 40−45
Valorant 24−27
−596%
160−170
+596%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−4200%
40−45
+4200%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1200%
12−14
+1200%
Dota 2 16−18
−450%
85−90
+450%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−560%
30−35
+560%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−733%
50−55
+733%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−540%
30−35
+540%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−540%
30−35
+540%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

This is how GTX 675M and Pro W6600M compete in popular games:

  • Pro W6600M is 483% faster in 900p
  • Pro W6600M is 483% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro W6600M is 4200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro W6600M is ahead in 59 tests (95%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.31 25.77
Recency 22 March 2012 8 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 90 Watt

Pro W6600M has a 497.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 11.1% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro W6600M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 675M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 675M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro W6600M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M
GeForce GTX 675M
AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
Radeon Pro W6600M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 21 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 675M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 675M or Radeon Pro W6600M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.