GeForce GT 730 vs GTX 675M SLI
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 675M SLI with GeForce GT 730, including specs and performance data.
GTX 675M SLI outperforms GT 730 by a whopping 302% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 499 | 866 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 43 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.19 |
| Power efficiency | 2.99 | 3.03 |
| Architecture | Fermi (2010−2014) | Fermi (2010−2014) |
| GPU code name | N12E-GTX2 | GF108 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 6 January 2011 (14 years ago) | 18 June 2014 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $59.99 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | 96 |
| Core clock speed | 620 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 585 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2x 100 Watt | 49 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 11.2 GT/s |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 0.2688 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 4 |
| TMUs | no data | 16 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 145 mm |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
| SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 25.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| HDMI | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | no data | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | - | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
+325%
|
4−5
−325%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+325%
|
4−5
−325%
|
| Elden Ring | 24−27
+380%
|
5−6
−380%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
+367%
|
6−7
−367%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
+325%
|
4−5
−325%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+325%
|
4−5
−325%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+338%
|
8−9
−338%
|
| Metro Exodus | 21−24
+360%
|
5−6
−360%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 24−27
+380%
|
5−6
−380%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
+343%
|
7−8
−343%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
+367%
|
6−7
−367%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
+325%
|
4−5
−325%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+325%
|
4−5
−325%
|
| Dota 2 | 30−35
+343%
|
7−8
−343%
|
| Elden Ring | 24−27
+380%
|
5−6
−380%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 35−40
+311%
|
9−10
−311%
|
| Fortnite | 50−55
+325%
|
12−14
−325%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+338%
|
8−9
−338%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35
+343%
|
7−8
−343%
|
| Metro Exodus | 21−24
+360%
|
5−6
−360%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 65−70
+325%
|
16−18
−325%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 24−27
+380%
|
5−6
−380%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+333%
|
6−7
−333%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
+343%
|
7−8
−343%
|
| World of Tanks | 120−130
+330%
|
30−33
−330%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
+367%
|
6−7
−367%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
+325%
|
4−5
−325%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+325%
|
4−5
−325%
|
| Dota 2 | 30−35
+343%
|
7−8
−343%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 35−40
+311%
|
9−10
−311%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+338%
|
8−9
−338%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 65−70
+325%
|
16−18
−325%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
+343%
|
7−8
−343%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 10−11
+400%
|
2−3
−400%
|
| Elden Ring | 12−14
+500%
|
2−3
−500%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 10−12
+450%
|
2−3
−450%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 40−45
+320%
|
10−11
−320%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 7−8
+600%
|
1−2
−600%
|
| World of Tanks | 60−65
+350%
|
14−16
−350%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 16−18
+433%
|
3−4
−433%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−11
+400%
|
2−3
−400%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18−20
+350%
|
4−5
−350%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
+350%
|
4−5
−350%
|
| Metro Exodus | 14−16
+400%
|
3−4
−400%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
+400%
|
2−3
−400%
|
| Valorant | 21−24
+340%
|
5−6
−340%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 18−20
+375%
|
4−5
−375%
|
| Elden Ring | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 18−20
+375%
|
4−5
−375%
|
| Metro Exodus | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 24−27
+317%
|
6−7
−317%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 18−20
+375%
|
4−5
−375%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 7−8
+600%
|
1−2
−600%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 18−20
+375%
|
4−5
−375%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 10−11
+400%
|
2−3
−400%
|
| Fortnite | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
+400%
|
2−3
−400%
|
| Valorant | 8−9
+700%
|
1−2
−700%
|
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 8.68 | 2.16 |
| Recency | 6 January 2011 | 18 June 2014 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2 Watt | 49 Watt |
GTX 675M SLI has a 301.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 2350% lower power consumption.
GT 730, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years.
The GeForce GTX 675M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 730 in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 675M SLI is a notebook card while GeForce GT 730 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
