GeForce 7000M vs GTX 675M SLI
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 675M SLI and GeForce 7000M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
GTX 675M SLI outperforms 7000M by a whopping 28167% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 505 | 1493 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 2.98 | no data |
| Architecture | Fermi (2010−2014) | no data |
| GPU code name | N12E-GTX2 | C67 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 6 January 2011 (14 years ago) | 1 February 2006 (19 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | 3 |
| Core clock speed | 620 MHz | 1 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 350 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2x 100 Watt | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | shared Memory |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | + | - |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11 | shared Memory |
| CUDA | + | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Atomic Heart | 20−22
+1900%
|
1−2
−1900%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
+129%
|
7−8
−129%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+1600%
|
1−2
−1600%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Atomic Heart | 20−22
+1900%
|
1−2
−1900%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
+129%
|
7−8
−129%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+1600%
|
1−2
−1600%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+1700%
|
2−3
−1700%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 27−30
+383%
|
6−7
−383%
|
| Valorant | 80−85
+242%
|
24−27
−242%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Atomic Heart | 20−22
+1900%
|
1−2
−1900%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
+129%
|
7−8
−129%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 120−130
+1322%
|
9−10
−1322%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+1600%
|
1−2
−1600%
|
| Dota 2 | 60−65
+663%
|
8−9
−663%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+1700%
|
2−3
−1700%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 30−33 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 27−30
+383%
|
6−7
−383%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
+600%
|
3−4
−600%
|
| Valorant | 80−85
+242%
|
24−27
−242%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
+129%
|
7−8
−129%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+1600%
|
1−2
−1600%
|
| Dota 2 | 60−65
+663%
|
8−9
−663%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+1700%
|
2−3
−1700%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 27−30
+383%
|
6−7
−383%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
+600%
|
3−4
−600%
|
| Valorant | 80−85
+242%
|
24−27
−242%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 45−50 | 0−1 |
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 60−65 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 90−95 | 0−1 |
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14 | 0−1 |
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K
High Preset
| Atomic Heart | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 18−20
+26.7%
|
14−16
−26.7%
|
| Metro Exodus | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 40−45
+4100%
|
1−2
−4100%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 30−33 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 8−9
+700%
|
1−2
−700%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
+300%
|
2−3
−300%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 8−9
+300%
|
2−3
−300%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 675M SLI is 4100% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, GTX 675M SLI surpassed GeForce 7000M in all 30 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 8.48 | 0.03 |
| Recency | 6 January 2011 | 1 February 2006 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 90 nm |
GTX 675M SLI has a 28166.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 125% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce GTX 675M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7000M in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
