GeForce 7000M vs GTX 675M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 675M SLI and GeForce 7000M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 675M SLI
2011
2 Watt
8.68
+28833%

GTX 675M SLI outperforms 7000M by a whopping 28833% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5001487
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.99no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)no data
GPU code nameN12E-GTX2C67
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 January 2011 (14 years ago)1 February 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7683
Core clock speed620 MHz1 MHz
Boost clock speedno data350 MHz
Manufacturing process technology40 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2x 100 Wattno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5shared Memory
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed3000 MHzno data
Shared memory-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11shared Memory
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+600%
5−6
−600%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24 0−1
Metro Exodus 21−24 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+700%
3−4
−700%
Valorant 30−35 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
Dota 2 30−35 0−1
Far Cry 5 35−40
+640%
5−6
−640%
Fortnite 50−55 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+600%
5−6
−600%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35 0−1
Metro Exodus 21−24 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+1600%
4−5
−1600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+700%
3−4
−700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+550%
4−5
−550%
Valorant 30−35 0−1
World of Tanks 120−130
+1513%
8−9
−1513%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
Dota 2 30−35 0−1
Far Cry 5 35−40
+640%
5−6
−640%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+600%
5−6
−600%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+1600%
4−5
−1600%
Valorant 30−35 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 10−12 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 10−12 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8 0−1
World of Tanks 60−65 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 12−14 0−1
Metro Exodus 14−16 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Valorant 21−24
+450%
4−5
−450%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 18−20
+26.7%
14−16
−26.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+26.7%
14−16
−26.7%
Metro Exodus 4−5 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+26.7%
14−16
−26.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Dota 2 18−20
+26.7%
14−16
−26.7%
Far Cry 5 10−11 0−1
Fortnite 9−10 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−12 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 6−7 0−1
Valorant 8−9 0−1

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 675M SLI is 1600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 675M SLI is ahead in 28 tests (97%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.68 0.03
Recency 6 January 2011 1 February 2006
Chip lithography 40 nm 90 nm

GTX 675M SLI has a 28833.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 125% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 675M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7000M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M SLI
GeForce GTX 675M SLI
NVIDIA GeForce 7000M
GeForce 7000M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 675M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 23 votes

Rate GeForce 7000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.