Radeon HD 8770M vs GeForce GTX 670MX

Place in performance ranking	591	740
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	no data	0.33
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	GCN (2011−2017)
GPU code name	N13E-GR	Mars
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 October 2012 (11 years ago)	16 November 2012 (11 years ago)
Current price	no data	$338

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	960	384
CUDA cores	960	no data
Core clock speed	600 MHz	775 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	825 MHz
Number of transistors	3,540 million	950 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	48.0 billion/sec	19.80
Floating-point performance	1,154 gflops	633.6 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 670MX and Radeon HD 8770M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Bus support	PCI Express 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
SLI options	+	no data

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1400 MHz	4500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	67.2 GB/s	72 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data
HDCP	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	Up to 2048x1536	no data

Supported GPU Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 670MX 5.03
+71.1%

HD 8770M 2.94

GeForce GTX 670MX outperforms Radeon HD 8770M by 71% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 670MX 14530
+70.3%

HD 8770M 8530

GeForce GTX 670MX outperforms Radeon HD 8770M by 70% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 670MX 3587
+85.5%

HD 8770M 1934

GeForce GTX 670MX outperforms Radeon HD 8770M by 85% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−35%

54
+35%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

8−9
+33.3%

6−7

−33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Battlefield 5	14−16 +150%	6−7 −150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +33.3%	12−14 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +175%	4−5 −175%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 +175%	4−5 −175%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +129%	7−8 −129%
Hitman 3	10−12 +83.3%	6−7 −83.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +44.4%	9−10 −44.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Battlefield 5	14−16 +150%	6−7 −150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +33.3%	12−14 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +175%	4−5 −175%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 +175%	4−5 −175%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +129%	7−8 −129%
Hitman 3	10−12 +83.3%	6−7 −83.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
Metro Exodus	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +44.4%	9−10 −44.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Battlefield 5	14−16 +150%	6−7 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +175%	4−5 −175%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 +175%	4−5 −175%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +129%	7−8 −129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Hitman 3	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%
Metro Exodus	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4	0−1
Battlefield 5	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Hitman 3	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1−2	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1