Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs GeForce GTX 670MX

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 670MX and Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 670MX
2012
3 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
5.06

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) outperforms GTX 670MX by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking625608
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.6614.96
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameGK104Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 October 2012 (12 years ago)28 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96064
Core clock speed600 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1100 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt12-25 Watt
Texture fill rate48.08no data
Floating-point processing power1.154 TFLOPSno data
ROPs24no data
TMUs80no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR4
Maximum RAM amount3 GBno data
Memory bus width192 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1400 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth67.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.1no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 670MX 5.06
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 5.41
+6.9%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 670MX 3587
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 4187
+16.7%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 670MX 14530
+0.6%
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 14442

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 670MX 2371
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 2743
+15.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40
+135%
17
−135%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−15.4%
14−16
+15.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−9.1%
12
+9.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+55.6%
9
−55.6%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−12.5%
35−40
+12.5%
Hitman 3 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−9.4%
35−40
+9.4%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−50%
18
+50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+8.3%
12
−8.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−11.1%
20−22
+11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−19.6%
55
+19.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−15.4%
14−16
+15.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
11
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+250%
4
−250%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−12.5%
35−40
+12.5%
Hitman 3 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−9.4%
35−40
+9.4%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−16.7%
14
+16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+44.4%
9
−44.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+5.9%
17
−5.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−5.6%
18−20
+5.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−10.9%
51
+10.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−12.5%
35−40
+12.5%
Hitman 3 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+191%
11
−191%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+20%
15
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+100%
9
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−4.3%
45−50
+4.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−15.4%
14−16
+15.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−36.4%
14−16
+36.4%
Hitman 3 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−9.4%
35−40
+9.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Hitman 3 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 0−1

This is how GTX 670MX and Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) compete in popular games:

  • GTX 670MX is 135% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 670MX is 250% faster.
  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 670MX is ahead in 8 tests (12%)
  • Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is ahead in 50 tests (72%)
  • there's a draw in 11 tests (16%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.06 5.41
Recency 1 October 2012 28 May 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 12 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) has a 6.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 525% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 670MX and Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU).


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
GeForce GTX 670MX
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 51 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 670MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 237 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.