GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile vs GTX 670MX

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 670MX and GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 670MX
2012
3 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
4.72

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile outperforms GTX 670MX by a whopping 385% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking667257
Place by popularitynot in top-10079
Power efficiency4.7929.06
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGK104GN20-P0-R 6 GB
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 October 2012 (12 years ago)6 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9602560
Core clock speed600 MHz1237 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1492 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate48.08no data
Floating-point processing power1.154 TFLOPSno data
ROPs24no data
TMUs80no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount3 GB6 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed1400 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth67.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12_2
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.1no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 670MX 4.72
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 22.89
+385%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 670MX 3587
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 16980
+373%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 670MX 2371
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 11973
+405%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40
−75%
70
+75%
1440p7−8
−386%
34
+386%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−533%
130−140
+533%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−800%
81
+800%
Sons of the Forest 6−7
−717%
45−50
+717%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
−365%
90−95
+365%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−533%
130−140
+533%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−611%
64
+611%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−467%
85
+467%
Fortnite 27−30
−314%
110−120
+314%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−323%
90−95
+323%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
−469%
70−75
+469%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−379%
90−95
+379%
Sons of the Forest 6−7
−717%
45−50
+717%
Valorant 60−65
−172%
160−170
+172%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
−365%
90−95
+365%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−533%
130−140
+533%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 96
−165%
250−260
+165%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−411%
46
+411%
Dota 2 40−45
−195%
120−130
+195%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−420%
78
+420%
Fortnite 27−30
−314%
110−120
+314%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−323%
90−95
+323%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
−469%
70−75
+469%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−475%
92
+475%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−467%
50−55
+467%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−379%
90−95
+379%
Sons of the Forest 6−7
−717%
45−50
+717%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−550%
91
+550%
Valorant 60−65
−172%
160−170
+172%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
−365%
90−95
+365%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−333%
39
+333%
Dota 2 40−45
−195%
120−130
+195%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−393%
74
+393%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−323%
90−95
+323%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−379%
90−95
+379%
Sons of the Forest 6−7
−717%
45−50
+717%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−257%
50
+257%
Valorant 60−65
−172%
160−170
+172%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
−314%
110−120
+314%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
−349%
160−170
+349%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
−700%
40
+700%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−675%
30−35
+675%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−400%
170−180
+400%
Valorant 50−55
−285%
200−210
+285%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−1525%
65−70
+1525%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−667%
21−24
+667%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−478%
52
+478%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
Sons of the Forest 3−4
−967%
30−35
+967%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−517%
37
+517%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
−522%
55−60
+522%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−153%
40−45
+153%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 35−40
Valorant 24−27
−467%
130−140
+467%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−1700%
35−40
+1700%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Dota 2 16−18
−381%
75−80
+381%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−583%
40−45
+583%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−400%
24−27
+400%
Sons of the Forest 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−400%
24−27
+400%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

This is how GTX 670MX and RTX 3050 6GB Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 75% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 386% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 1700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is ahead in 61 tests (95%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.72 22.89
Recency 1 October 2012 6 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 60 Watt

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile has a 385% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 670MX in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
GeForce GTX 670MX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 55 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 670MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 913 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 670MX or GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.