GeForce GT 710 vs GTX 670MX SLI
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 670MX SLI with GeForce GT 710, including specs and performance data.
670MX SLI outperforms GT 710 by a whopping 517% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 512 | 1016 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 81 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.04 |
Power efficiency | 4.66 | 5.96 |
Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015) |
GPU code name | N13E-GR | GK208 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 October 2012 (13 years ago) | 27 March 2014 (11 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $34.99 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1920 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 954 MHz |
Number of transistors | 5080 Million | 915 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 19 Watt |
Maximum GPU temperature | no data | 95 °C |
Texture fill rate | no data | 15.26 |
Floating-point processing power | no data | 0.3663 TFLOPS |
ROPs | no data | 8 |
TMUs | no data | 16 |
L1 Cache | no data | 16 KB |
L2 Cache | no data | 128 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | large | no data |
Bus support | no data | PCI Express 2.0 |
Interface | no data | PCIe 2.0 x8 |
Length | no data | 145 mm |
Height | no data | 2.713" (6.9 cm) |
Width | no data | 1-slot |
Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | no data | 2 GB |
Memory bus width | 2x 192 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz | 1.8 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | no data | 14.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
Display Connectors | no data | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA |
Multi monitor support | no data | 3 displays |
HDMI | - | + |
HDCP | - | + |
Maximum VGA resolution | no data | 2048x1536 |
Audio input for HDMI | no data | Internal |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
3D Vision | - | + |
PureVideo | - | + |
PhysX | - | + |
Optimus | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 11 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | no data | 5.1 |
OpenGL | no data | 4.5 |
OpenCL | no data | 1.2 |
Vulkan | - | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 71
+788%
| 8
−788%
|
1440p | 18−20
+500%
| 3
−500%
|
4K | 40−45
+471%
| 7
−471%
|
Cost per frame, $
1080p | no data | 4.37 |
1440p | no data | 11.66 |
4K | no data | 5.00 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50 | 0−1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+533%
|
3−4
−533%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 16−18
+183%
|
6−7
−183%
|
Full HD
Medium
Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+1950%
|
2−3
−1950%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50 | 0−1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+533%
|
3−4
−533%
|
Far Cry 5 | 30−33
+500%
|
5
−500%
|
Fortnite | 55−60
+1020%
|
5−6
−1020%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+344%
|
9−10
−344%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 27−30
+1300%
|
2−3
−1300%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 16−18
+183%
|
6−7
−183%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+230%
|
10−11
−230%
|
Valorant | 90−95
+157%
|
35−40
−157%
|
Full HD
High
Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+1950%
|
2−3
−1950%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50 | 0−1 |
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 168
+409%
|
30−35
−409%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+533%
|
3−4
−533%
|
Dota 2 | 65−70
+235%
|
20
−235%
|
Far Cry 5 | 30−33
+650%
|
4
−650%
|
Fortnite | 55−60
+1020%
|
5−6
−1020%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+344%
|
9−10
−344%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 27−30
+1300%
|
2−3
−1300%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35
+278%
|
9
−278%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 16−18
+183%
|
6−7
−183%
|
Metro Exodus | 18−20
+500%
|
3
−500%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+230%
|
10−11
−230%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+380%
|
5
−380%
|
Valorant | 90−95
+157%
|
35−40
−157%
|
Full HD
Ultra
Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+1950%
|
2−3
−1950%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+533%
|
3−4
−533%
|
Dota 2 | 65−70
+272%
|
18
−272%
|
Far Cry 5 | 30−33
+650%
|
4
−650%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+344%
|
9−10
−344%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 16−18
+183%
|
6−7
−183%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+230%
|
10−11
−230%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+700%
|
3
−700%
|
Valorant | 90−95
+157%
|
35−40
−157%
|
Full HD
Epic
Fortnite | 55−60
+1020%
|
5−6
−1020%
|
1440p
High
Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
+325%
|
4−5
−325%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 70−75
+610%
|
10−11
−610%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 12−14
+550%
|
2−3
−550%
|
Metro Exodus | 10−11
+900%
|
1−2
−900%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+229%
|
14−16
−229%
|
Valorant | 100−110
+1371%
|
7−8
−1371%
|
1440p
Ultra
Battlefield 5 | 21−24
+633%
|
3−4
−633%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
+600%
|
1−2
−600%
|
Far Cry 5 | 18−20
+850%
|
2−3
−850%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+450%
|
4−5
−450%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 10−11
+900%
|
1−2
−900%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
+550%
|
2−3
−550%
|
1440p
Epic
Fortnite | 18−20
+850%
|
2−3
−850%
|
4K
High
Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
Grand Theft Auto V | 20−22
+33.3%
|
14−16
−33.3%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 4−5 | 0−1 |
Metro Exodus | 5−6 | 0−1 |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
+900%
|
1−2
−900%
|
Valorant | 45−50
+586%
|
7−8
−586%
|
4K
Ultra
Battlefield 5 | 10−12
+1000%
|
1−2
−1000%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
Dota 2 | 30−35
+386%
|
7
−386%
|
Far Cry 5 | 9−10
+800%
|
1−2
−800%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
+650%
|
2−3
−650%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 4−5 | 0−1 |
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
4K
Epic
Fortnite | 9−10
+200%
|
3−4
−200%
|
This is how GTX 670MX SLI and GT 710 compete in popular games:
- GTX 670MX SLI is 788% faster in 1080p
- GTX 670MX SLI is 500% faster in 1440p
- GTX 670MX SLI is 471% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 670MX SLI is 1950% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, GTX 670MX SLI surpassed GT 710 in all 50 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 8.64 | 1.40 |
Recency | 1 October 2012 | 27 March 2014 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 19 Watt |
GTX 670MX SLI has a 517.1% higher aggregate performance score.
GT 710, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 689.5% lower power consumption.
The GeForce GTX 670MX SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 710 in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 670MX SLI is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GT 710 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.