Radeon R7 M275DX vs GeForce GTX 660M

Place in the ranking	710	739
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	5.23	no data
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	GCN (2012−2015)
GPU code name	GK107	no data
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	22 March 2012 (12 years ago)	4 June 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	896
Core clock speed	835 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	950 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1,270 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	30.40	no data
Floating-point processing power	0.7296 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	16	no data
TMUs	32	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Bus support	PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	no data
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	no data
Memory bus width	128bit	no data
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	64.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	no data
Eyefinity	-	+
HDMI	+	-
HDCP	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	Up to 2048x1536	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	-	+
Optimus	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	12
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.5	no data
OpenCL	1.1	no data
Vulkan	1.1.126	-
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 660M 3.79
+13.1%

R7 M275DX 3.35

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 660M 2369

R7 M275DX 3553
+50%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 660M 10971
+32%

R7 M275DX 8309

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 660M 1751

R7 M275DX 1932
+10.3%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 660M 12861
+15.2%

R7 M275DX 11160

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	32 +18.5%	27−30 −18.5%
Full HD	35 +40%	25 −40%
1200p	38 +26.7%	30−35 −26.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Elden Ring	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +13.3%	14−16 −13.3%
Metro Exodus	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +18.2%	10−12 −18.2%
Valorant	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Dota 2	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%
Elden Ring	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Far Cry 5	20−22 +11.1%	18−20 −11.1%
Fortnite	21−24 +15.8%	18−20 −15.8%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +13.3%	14−16 −13.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%
Metro Exodus	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 +10%	30−33 −10%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +18.2%	10−12 −18.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%
Valorant	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
World of Tanks	89 +89.4%	47 −89.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Dota 2	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%
Far Cry 5	20−22 +11.1%	18−20 −11.1%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +13.3%	14−16 −13.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 +10%	30−33 −10%
Valorant	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Elden Ring	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 +12.5%	24−27 −12.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
World of Tanks	27−30 +17.4%	21−24 −17.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Far Cry 5	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Metro Exodus	0−1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Valorant	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Elden Ring	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10−12 +22.2%	9−10 −22.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Dota 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Far Cry 5	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Fortnite	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Valorant	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%