RTX A5000 Mobile vs GeForce GTX 660M
Aggregated performance score
RTX A5000 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 660M by a whopping 978% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 669 | 98 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.68 | no data |
| Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | Ampere (2020−2022) |
| GPU code name | N13E-GE | GA104 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 22 March 2012 (12 years ago) | 12 April 2021 (3 years ago) |
| Current price | $276 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 6144 |
| CUDA cores | 384 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 835 MHz | 1215 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,270 million | 17,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 165 Watt (80 - 150 Watt TGP) |
| Texture fill rate | 30.4 billion/sec | 302.4 |
| Floating-point performance | 729.6 gflops | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on GeForce GTX 660M and RTX A5000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | large | large |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | no data |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| SLI options | + | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| HDMI | + | no data |
| HDCP | + | no data |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2 |
| CUDA | + | 8.6 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
RTX A5000 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 660M by 978% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
RTX A5000 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 660M by 1427% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
RTX A5000 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 660M by 1457% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
RTX A5000 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 660M by 290% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| 900p | 30
−900%
| 300−350
+900%
|
| Full HD | 35
−203%
| 106
+203%
|
| 1200p | 38
−953%
| 400−450
+953%
|
| 1440p | 6−7
−1017%
| 67
+1017%
|
| 4K | 4−5
−1100%
| 48
+1100%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
−914%
|
70−75
+914%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 6−7
−1067%
|
70−75
+1067%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 2−3
−3700%
|
76
+3700%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 10−11
−1050%
|
110−120
+1050%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 14−16
−679%
|
100−110
+679%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
−914%
|
70−75
+914%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 7−8
−1229%
|
93
+1229%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 7−8
−1114%
|
85
+1114%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12
−1000%
|
120−130
+1000%
|
| Hitman 3 | 8−9
−1738%
|
147
+1738%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 6−7
−1717%
|
109
+1717%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 7−8
−814%
|
60−65
+814%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 10−12
−891%
|
109
+891%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 3−4
−2033%
|
64
+2033%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 6−7
−1067%
|
70−75
+1067%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 2−3
−3100%
|
64
+3100%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 10−11
−1050%
|
110−120
+1050%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 14−16
−679%
|
100−110
+679%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
−914%
|
70−75
+914%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 7−8
−1186%
|
90
+1186%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 7−8
−1014%
|
78
+1014%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12
−1000%
|
120−130
+1000%
|
| Hitman 3 | 8−9
−1550%
|
132
+1550%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 6−7
−1500%
|
96
+1500%
|
| Metro Exodus | 5−6
−1500%
|
80
+1500%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 7−8
−814%
|
60−65
+814%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 10−12
−809%
|
100
+809%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
−1775%
|
150
+1775%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 3−4
−1900%
|
60
+1900%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 6−7
−1067%
|
70−75
+1067%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 2−3
−2650%
|
55
+2650%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 10−11
−1050%
|
110−120
+1050%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
−914%
|
70−75
+914%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 7−8
−1114%
|
85
+1114%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 7−8
−914%
|
71
+914%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12
−1000%
|
120−130
+1000%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
−1025%
|
90
+1025%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 3−4
−1400%
|
45
+1400%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 6−7
−1000%
|
65−70
+1000%
|
| Hitman 3 | 7−8
−1143%
|
87
+1143%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−11
−630%
|
73
+630%
|
| Metro Exodus | 2−3
−2100%
|
44
+2100%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
−1500%
|
30−35
+1500%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
−914%
|
71
+914%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2
−4200%
|
40−45
+4200%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−1500%
|
30−35
+1500%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−1217%
|
79
+1217%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2
−6100%
|
62
+6100%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−2700%
|
80−85
+2700%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−1833%
|
55−60
+1833%
|
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−1100%
|
35−40
+1100%
|
| Hitman 3 | 4−5
−1075%
|
47
+1075%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 7−8
−186%
|
20
+186%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
−950%
|
21−24
+950%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 0−1 | 38 |
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 2−3
−1250%
|
27−30
+1250%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 1−2
−2800%
|
29
+2800%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−1000%
|
44
+1000%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 6−7
−617%
|
43
+617%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−5500%
|
55−60
+5500%
|
This is how GTX 660M and RTX A5000 Mobile compete in popular games:
- RTX A5000 Mobile is 900% faster in 900p
- RTX A5000 Mobile is 203% faster in 1080p
- RTX A5000 Mobile is 953% faster in 1200p
- RTX A5000 Mobile is 1017% faster in 1440p
- RTX A5000 Mobile is 1100% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX A5000 Mobile is 6100% faster than the GTX 660M.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, RTX A5000 Mobile surpassed GTX 660M in all 59 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.70 | 39.88 |
| Recency | 22 March 2012 | 12 April 2021 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 16 GB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 165 Watt |
The RTX A5000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 660M in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
