T400 vs GeForce GTX 660 Ti

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

GTX 660 Ti
2012
2048 MB GDDR5
11.39
+21.4%

GeForce GTX 660 Ti outperforms T400 by a significant 21% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking386436
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.6316.46
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameGK104TU117
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date16 August 2012 (11 years ago)6 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data
Current price$189 (0.6x MSRP)$83

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

T400 has 526% better value for money than GTX 660 Ti.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1344384
CUDA cores1344no data
Core clock speed915 MHzno data
Boost clock speed980 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate102.5 billion/sec34.20
Floating-point performance2,459.5 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length9.5" (24.1 cm)no data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsTwo 6-pinNone
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width192-bit GDDR564 Bit
Memory clock speed6.0 GB/s10 GB/s
Memory bandwidth144.2 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort3x mini-DisplayPort
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+no data
3D Gaming+no data
3D Vision+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 660 Ti 11.39
+21.4%
T400 9.38

GeForce GTX 660 Ti outperforms T400 by 21% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 660 Ti 4409
+21.5%
T400 3628

GeForce GTX 660 Ti outperforms T400 by 22% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GTX 660 Ti 15192
T400 16889
+11.2%

T400 outperforms GeForce GTX 660 Ti by 11% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

GTX 660 Ti 14179
T400 15891
+12.1%

T400 outperforms GeForce GTX 660 Ti by 12% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 660 Ti 11274
T400 16856
+49.5%

T400 outperforms GeForce GTX 660 Ti by 50% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD77
+28.3%
60−65
−28.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+30%
30−33
−30%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+38.1%
21−24
−38.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Hitman 3 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+30%
30−33
−30%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+38.1%
21−24
−38.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Hitman 3 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+30%
30−33
−30%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+38.1%
21−24
−38.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Hitman 3 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Hitman 3 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Battlefield 5 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

This is how GTX 660 Ti and T400 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 660 Ti is 28% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.39 9.38
Recency 16 August 2012 6 May 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 30 Watt

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the T400 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
NVIDIA T400
T400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 764 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 364 votes

Rate T400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.