Radeon Pro Vega 48 vs GeForce GTX 660 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

GTX 660 Ti
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
11.42

Radeon Pro Vega 48 outperforms GeForce GTX 660 Ti by a whopping 156% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking387178
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.6726.41
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGK104Vega 10
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date16 August 2012 (11 years ago)19 March 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data
Current price$189 (0.6x MSRP)$671

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro Vega 48 has 889% better value for money than GTX 660 Ti.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores13443072
CUDA cores1344no data
Core clock speed915 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speed980 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Wattno data
Texture fill rate102.5 billion/sec249.6
Floating-point performance2,459.5 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 660 Ti and Radeon Pro Vega 48 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length9.5" (24.1 cm)no data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsTwo 6-pinNone
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width192-bit GDDR52048 Bit
Memory clock speed6.0 GB/s1572 MHz
Memory bandwidth144.2 GB/s402.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPortNo outputs
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+no data
3D Gaming+no data
3D Vision+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.125
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 660 Ti 11.42
Pro Vega 48 29.24
+156%

Radeon Pro Vega 48 outperforms GeForce GTX 660 Ti by 156% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 660 Ti 4413
Pro Vega 48 11299
+156%

Radeon Pro Vega 48 outperforms GeForce GTX 660 Ti by 156% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GTX 660 Ti 15210
Pro Vega 48 53515
+252%

Radeon Pro Vega 48 outperforms GeForce GTX 660 Ti by 252% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

GTX 660 Ti 14179
Pro Vega 48 57715
+307%

Radeon Pro Vega 48 outperforms GeForce GTX 660 Ti by 307% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD81
−147%
200−210
+147%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−150%
45−50
+150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−150%
60−65
+150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−150%
45−50
+150%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−150%
90−95
+150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−140%
60−65
+140%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−150%
45−50
+150%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−142%
80−85
+142%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−150%
80−85
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−144%
95−100
+144%
Hitman 3 24−27
−150%
65−70
+150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−143%
90−95
+143%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−150%
85−90
+150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−150%
80−85
+150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−150%
80−85
+150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
−150%
50−55
+150%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−150%
60−65
+150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−150%
45−50
+150%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−150%
90−95
+150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−140%
60−65
+140%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−150%
45−50
+150%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−142%
80−85
+142%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−150%
80−85
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−144%
95−100
+144%
Hitman 3 24−27
−150%
65−70
+150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−143%
90−95
+143%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−150%
85−90
+150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−150%
80−85
+150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−150%
80−85
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−139%
55−60
+139%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
−150%
50−55
+150%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−150%
60−65
+150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−150%
45−50
+150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−140%
60−65
+140%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−150%
45−50
+150%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−142%
80−85
+142%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−144%
95−100
+144%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−143%
90−95
+143%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−150%
85−90
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−139%
55−60
+139%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
−150%
50−55
+150%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−150%
80−85
+150%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−150%
55−60
+150%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
−150%
50−55
+150%
Hitman 3 16−18
−150%
40−45
+150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−150%
45−50
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−138%
50−55
+138%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−139%
55−60
+139%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−150%
45−50
+150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−135%
40−45
+135%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 24−27
−150%
65−70
+150%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
Hitman 3 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−140%
24−27
+140%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−133%
35−40
+133%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%

This is how GTX 660 Ti and Pro Vega 48 compete in popular games:

  • Pro Vega 48 is 147% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.42 29.24
Recency 16 August 2012 19 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 660 Ti in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 660 Ti is a desktop card while Radeon Pro Vega 48 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
Radeon Pro Vega 48

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 770 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 64 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 48 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.