ATI Radeon HD 5750 vs GeForce GTX 660 Ti

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 660 Ti and Radeon HD 5750, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 660 Ti
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
9.87
+278%

GTX 660 Ti outperforms ATI HD 5750 by a whopping 278% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking429786
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.75no data
Power efficiency5.242.42
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGK104Juniper
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date16 August 2012 (12 years ago)13 October 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1344720
Core clock speed915 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speed980 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,540 million1,040 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt86 Watt
Texture fill rate109.825.20
Floating-point processing power2.634 TFLOPS1.008 TFLOPS
ROPs2416
TMUs11236

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length241 mm178 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 6-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width192-bit GDDR5128 Bit
Memory clock speed6.0 GB/s1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth144.2 GB/s73.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI++
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.34.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 660 Ti 9.87
+278%
ATI HD 5750 2.61

  • Other tests
    • Passmark
    • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 660 Ti 4412
+278%
ATI HD 5750 1168

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 660 Ti 5432
+296%
ATI HD 5750 1370

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD77
+328%
18−21
−328%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.88no data

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 27−30
+286%
7−8
−286%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+314%
14−16
−314%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+340%
5−6
−340%
Atomic Heart 27−30
+286%
7−8
−286%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+292%
12−14
−292%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+314%
14−16
−314%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+340%
5−6
−340%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+300%
9−10
−300%
Fortnite 60−65
+294%
16−18
−294%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+283%
12−14
−283%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+313%
8−9
−313%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+290%
10−11
−290%
Valorant 95−100
+308%
24−27
−308%
Atomic Heart 27−30
+286%
7−8
−286%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+292%
12−14
−292%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+314%
14−16
−314%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 192
+284%
50−55
−284%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+340%
5−6
−340%
Dota 2 75−80
+317%
18−20
−317%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+300%
9−10
−300%
Fortnite 60−65
+294%
16−18
−294%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+283%
12−14
−283%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+313%
8−9
−313%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+310%
10−11
−310%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+340%
5−6
−340%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+290%
10−11
−290%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+300%
7−8
−300%
Valorant 95−100
+308%
24−27
−308%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+292%
12−14
−292%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+340%
5−6
−340%
Dota 2 75−80
+317%
18−20
−317%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+300%
9−10
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+283%
12−14
−283%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+290%
10−11
−290%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+300%
7−8
−300%
Valorant 95−100
+308%
24−27
−308%
Fortnite 60−65
+294%
16−18
−294%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+300%
5−6
−300%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85
+290%
21−24
−290%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+294%
16−18
−294%
Valorant 110−120
+293%
30−33
−293%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+300%
7−8
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+283%
6−7
−283%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+333%
6−7
−333%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Fortnite 21−24
+283%
6−7
−283%
Atomic Heart 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+340%
5−6
−340%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Valorant 55−60
+307%
14−16
−307%
Battlefield 5 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Dota 2 35−40
+290%
10−11
−290%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Fortnite 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%

This is how GTX 660 Ti and ATI HD 5750 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 660 Ti is 328% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.87 2.61
Recency 16 August 2012 13 October 2009
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 86 Watt

GTX 660 Ti has a 278.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI HD 5750, on the other hand, has 74.4% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 5750 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
ATI Radeon HD 5750
Radeon HD 5750

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2
844 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7
299 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 660 Ti or Radeon HD 5750, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.