Quadro P620 vs GeForce GTX 660 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 660 Ti with Quadro P620, including specs and performance data.

GTX 660 Ti
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
11.43
+21.6%

GTX 660 Ti outperforms Quadro P620 by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking386439
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.6921.28
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGK104GP107
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date16 August 2012 (11 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data
Current price$189 (0.6x MSRP)$170

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P620 has 691% better value for money than GTX 660 Ti.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1344512
CUDA cores1344no data
Core clock speed915 MHz1177 MHz
Boost clock speed980 MHz1442 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate102.5 billion/sec43.33
Floating-point performance2,459.5 gflops1,490 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length9.5" (24.1 cm)145 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsTwo 6-pinNone
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width192-bit GDDR5128 Bit
Memory clock speed6.0 GB/s6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth144.2 GB/s80.13 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort4x mini-DisplayPort
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+no data
3D Gaming+no data
3D Vision+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA+6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 660 Ti 11.43
+21.6%
Quadro P620 9.40

GeForce GTX 660 Ti outperforms Quadro P620 by 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 660 Ti 4415
+21.6%
Quadro P620 3632

GeForce GTX 660 Ti outperforms Quadro P620 by 22% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 660 Ti 8415
+42.4%
Quadro P620 5909

GeForce GTX 660 Ti outperforms Quadro P620 by 42% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 660 Ti 23726
Quadro P620 25105
+5.8%

Quadro P620 outperforms GeForce GTX 660 Ti by 6% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 660 Ti 5432
+16.3%
Quadro P620 4673

GeForce GTX 660 Ti outperforms Quadro P620 by 16% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 660 Ti 37758
+24.2%
Quadro P620 30410

GeForce GTX 660 Ti outperforms Quadro P620 by 24% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GTX 660 Ti 15207
+28.7%
Quadro P620 11816

GeForce GTX 660 Ti outperforms Quadro P620 by 29% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

GTX 660 Ti 15609
+39%
Quadro P620 11228

GeForce GTX 660 Ti outperforms Quadro P620 by 39% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 660 Ti 11274
Quadro P620 11727
+4%

Quadro P620 outperforms GeForce GTX 660 Ti by 4% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD84
+52.7%
55
−52.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20 no data
Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 no data
Far Cry 5 27−30 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35 no data
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 no data
Hitman 3 21−24 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50 no data
Metro Exodus 35−40 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20 no data
Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 no data
Far Cry 5 27−30 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35 no data
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 no data
Hitman 3 21−24 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50 no data
Metro Exodus 35−40 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 no data
Far Cry 5 27−30 no data
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 no data
Far Cry 5 18−20 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 no data
Hitman 3 14−16 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24 no data
Metro Exodus 18−20 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9 no data
Hitman 3 7−8 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Far Cry 5 6−7 no data
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14 no data
Metro Exodus 10−12 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12 no data

This is how GTX 660 Ti and Quadro P620 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 660 Ti is 53% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.43 9.40
Recency 16 August 2012 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 25 Watt

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P620 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 660 Ti is a desktop card while Quadro P620 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
NVIDIA Quadro P620
Quadro P620

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 772 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 559 votes

Rate Quadro P620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.