Radeon Vega 3 Efficient vs GeForce GTX 660 OEM

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking736not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.80no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGK104Raven
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date22 August 2012 (12 years ago)26 May 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1152192
Core clock speed823 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed888 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate85.2512.00
Floating-point processing power2.046 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs9612

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1400 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 August 2012 26 May 2018
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 15 Watt

Vega 3 Efficient has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 766.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 660 OEM and Radeon Vega 3 Efficient. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
GeForce GTX 660 OEM
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Efficient
Radeon Vega 3 Efficient

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 34 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 44 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 3 Efficient on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.