Radeon RX Vega 11 vs GeForce GTX 660 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
660 OEM 660 Ti 670 680 680 Mac Edition 690 760 760 OEM 760 OEM Rebrand 760 Ti OEM 760 X2 770
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
RX Vega 11 RX Vega 11 Efficient RX Vega 11 Embedded Vega 3 Efficient Vega 6 Embedded Vega 8 Efficient Vega 8 Embedded Vega 11 Embedded

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 660 OEM and Radeon RX Vega 11, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 660 OEM
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 130 Watt
3.10

RX Vega 11 outperforms 660 OEM by an impressive 61% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 660 OEM GTX 660 OEM
RX Vega 11 RX Vega 11

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking802675
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.8310.97
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGK104Raven
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date22 August 2012 (13 years ago)10 May 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1152704
Core clock speed823 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed888 MHz1251 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate85.2555.04
Floating-point processing power2.046 TFLOPS1.761 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs9644
L1 Cache96 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1400 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortMotherboard Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16−18
−75%
28
+75%
1440p3−4
−100%
6
+100%
4K7−8
−71.4%
12
+71.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 31
+0%
31
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 19
+0%
19
+0%
Fortnite 86
+0%
86
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 38
+0%
38
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 26
+0%
26
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 46
+0%
46
+0%
Far Cry 5 18
+0%
18
+0%
Fortnite 31
+0%
31
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35
+0%
35
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 17
+0%
17
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 9
+0%
9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+0%
14
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 25
+0%
25
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 42
+0%
42
+0%
Far Cry 5 17
+0%
17
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 29
+0%
29
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
+0%
10
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 8
+0%
8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 17
+0%
17
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12
+0%
12
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how GTX 660 OEM and RX Vega 11 compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega 11 is 75% faster in 1080p
  • RX Vega 11 is 100% faster in 1440p
  • RX Vega 11 is 71% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 61 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.10 5.00
Recency 22 August 2012 10 May 2018
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 35 Watt

RX Vega 11 has a 61.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 271.4% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega 11 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 660 OEM in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
GeForce GTX 660 OEM
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
Radeon RX Vega 11
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 660 OEM GeForce GTX 660 OEM
vs
ATI HD 4870 X2 Radeon HD 4870 X2
RX Vega 11 Radeon RX Vega 11
vs
Radeon 550 Radeon 550
GTX 660 OEM GeForce GTX 660 OEM
vs
HD 6770 Radeon HD 6770
GTX 650 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
vs
Tesla K40t Tesla K40t
GTX 650 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
vs
RX 6900 RX 6900
GTX 650 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
vs
ROG Ally GPU Ally GPU
GTX 660 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
vs
R9 M270 R9 M270
GTX 660 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
vs
Vega 11 Embedded Vega 11 Embedded
GTS 450 Rev. 3 NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3
vs
RTX 5070 Ti RTX 5070 Ti
9400 GT Rev. 3 NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
vs
ATI HD 4870 X2 HD 4870 X2
GT 640 NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
vs
7950 GT GeForce 7950 GT
GT 640 NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
vs
GTX 1660 GTX 1660
GT 620 NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
vs
ATI X850 XT Platinum AGP Radeon X850 XT Platinum AGP

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 38 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 2017 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 660 OEM or Radeon RX Vega 11, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.