GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh vs GTX 650

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking655not rated
Place by popularity59not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.23no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGK107TU117B
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 September 2012 (12 years ago)15 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$109 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841024
CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed1058 MHz1380 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1515 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)64 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate33.8696.96
Floating-point processing power0.8125 TFLOPS3.103 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs3264

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length147 mmno data
Height4.38" (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128-bit GDDR5128 Bit
Memory clock speed5.0 GB/s1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini HDMINo outputs
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.140
CUDA+7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 September 2012 15 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 64 Watt 50 Watt

GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh has an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 28% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 650 and GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 650 is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
GeForce GTX 650
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 3751 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 136 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.