FirePro V7900 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 650 Ti with FirePro V7900, including specs and performance data.

GTX 650 Ti
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 110 Watt
6.54
+9.5%

GTX 650 Ti outperforms V7900 by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking564581
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.94no data
Power efficiency4.122.76
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameGK106Cayman
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date9 October 2012 (12 years ago)24 May 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681280
Core clock speed928 MHz725 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 million2,640 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt151 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate59.3958.00
Floating-point processing power1.425 TFLOPS1.856 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs6480

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0PCIe 2.1 x16
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length145 mm279 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slot1-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed5.4 GB/s1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth86.4 GB/s160 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini HDMI4x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support4 Displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
StereoOutput3D-+
DisplayPort countno data4
Dual-link DVI support-+
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.34.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 650 Ti 6.54
+9.5%
FirePro V7900 5.97

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 650 Ti 2524
+9.5%
FirePro V7900 2304

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.54 5.97
Recency 9 October 2012 24 May 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 151 Watt

GTX 650 Ti has a 9.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 37.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 650 Ti and FirePro V7900.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 650 Ti is a desktop card while FirePro V7900 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
GeForce GTX 650 Ti
AMD FirePro V7900
FirePro V7900

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1779 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 650 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 16 votes

Rate FirePro V7900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.