FirePro A320 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 567 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.94 | no data |
Power efficiency | 4.11 | no data |
Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) |
GPU code name | GK106 | Trinity GL |
Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 9 October 2012 (12 years ago) | 6 June 2012 (12 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 928 MHz | 800 MHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 955 MHz |
Number of transistors | 2,540 million | 1,303 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 110 Watt | 100 Watt |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | no data |
Texture fill rate | 59.39 | 22.92 |
Floating-point processing power | 1.425 TFLOPS | 0.7334 TFLOPS |
ROPs | 16 | 8 |
TMUs | 64 | 24 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | no data |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | no data |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | no data |
Width | 1-slot | IGP |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | System Shared |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | System Shared |
Memory clock speed | 5.4 GB/s | System Shared |
Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini HDMI | No outputs |
Multi monitor support | 4 Displays | no data |
HDMI | + | - |
HDCP | + | - |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
3D Blu-Ray | + | - |
3D Gaming | + | - |
3D Vision | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 9 October 2012 | 6 June 2012 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 110 Watt | 100 Watt |
GTX 650 Ti has an age advantage of 4 months, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.
FirePro A320, on the other hand, has 10% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 650 Ti and FirePro A320. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 650 Ti is a desktop card while FirePro A320 is a workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.