Radeon PRO V710 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost with Radeon PRO V710, including specs and performance data.
PRO V710 outperforms 650 Ti Boost by a whopping 118% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 557 | 344 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.94 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 4.68 | 8.64 |
| Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) |
| GPU code name | GK106 | Navi 32 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 26 March 2013 (12 years ago) | 3 October 2024 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | 3456 |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 1900 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 2,540 million | 28,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 134 Watt | 158 Watt |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 66.05 | 432.0 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.585 TFLOPS | 27.65 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 24 | 96 |
| TMUs | 64 | 216 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 54 |
| L0 Cache | no data | 864 KB |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 768 KB |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB | 2 MB |
| L3 Cache | no data | 54 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | no data |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 28 GB |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 224 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | 2250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.2 GB/s | 504.0 GB/s |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Multi monitor support | 4 Displays | no data |
| HDMI | + | - |
| HDCP | + | - |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| 3D Blu-Ray | + | - |
| 3D Gaming | + | - |
| 3D Vision | + | - |
| 3D Vision Live | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | + | - |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 8.15 | 17.74 |
| Recency | 26 March 2013 | 3 October 2024 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 28 GB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 134 Watt | 158 Watt |
GTX 650 Ti Boost has 17.9% lower power consumption.
PRO V710, on the other hand, has a 117.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 1300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon PRO V710 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is a desktop graphics card while Radeon PRO V710 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
