Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost with Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, including specs and performance data.

GTX 650 Ti Boost
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 134 Watt
8.64
+16.1%

GTX 650 Ti Boost outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking464500
Place by popularitynot in top-10068
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.00no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameGK106Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date26 March 2013 (11 years ago)15 August 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169 no data
Current price$285 (1.7x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76880
CUDA cores768no data
Core clock speed980 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1033 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)134 Watt28 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate62.7 billion/secno data
Floating-point performance1,585 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length9.5" (24.1 cm)no data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsOne 6-pinno data
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width192 Bitno data
Memory clock speed6.0 GB/sno data
Memory bandwidth144.2 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPortno data
Multi monitor support4 Displaysno data
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+no data
3D Gaming+no data
3D Vision+no data
3D Vision Live+no data
Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.3no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126no data
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 650 Ti Boost 8.64
+16.1%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 7.44

GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs by 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 650 Ti Boost 4390
+10.1%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 3987

GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs by 10% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18−21
+0%
18
+0%
1440p10−12
+0%
10
+0%
4K16−18
+6.7%
15
−6.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+14.3%
14
−14.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+10.5%
19
−10.5%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+9.1%
21−24
−9.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+7.7%
13
−7.7%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+5.9%
16−18
−5.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+11.1%
35−40
−11.1%
Hitman 3 18−20
+12.5%
16
−12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+9.4%
32
−9.4%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+5.3%
38
−5.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+0%
30
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+12.5%
16
−12.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+12.5%
16
−12.5%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+9.1%
21−24
−9.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+5.9%
16−18
−5.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+11.1%
35−40
−11.1%
Hitman 3 18−20
+12.5%
16
−12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+2.9%
30−35
−2.9%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+8%
25
−8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+12.5%
24
−12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+9.1%
22
−9.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+12.2%
49
−12.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+12.5%
8
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+5.9%
16−18
−5.9%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+11.1%
35−40
−11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+12.5%
16
−12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+5%
20
−5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+9.1%
11
−9.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
+3.4%
27−30
−3.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%
Hitman 3 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+12.5%
16
−12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hitman 3 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%

This is how GTX 650 Ti Boost and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compete in popular games:

  • A tie in 1080p
  • A tie in 1440p
  • GTX 650 Ti Boost is 7% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.64 7.44
Recency 26 March 2013 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 134 Watt 28 Watt

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is a desktop card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 336 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 818 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.